Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![NSA Warrantless Surveillance Controversy]( "NSA Warrantless Surveillance Controversy")
NSA Warrantless Surveillance Controversy35,99 €![2005 Pennsylvania General Assembly Pay Raise Controversy]( "2005 Pennsylvania General Assembly Pay Raise Controversy")
2005 Pennsylvania General Assembly Pay Raise Controversy22,99 €![The Concept of Plea Bargaining and Corrupt Practices in Nigeria]( "The Concept of Plea Bargaining and Corrupt Practices in Nigeria")
The Concept of Plea Bargaining and Corrupt Practices in Nigeria39,99 €![Analytical study on the Iranian Partnership law and Partition law]( "Analytical study on the Iranian Partnership law and Partition law")
Analytical study on the Iranian Partnership law and Partition law46,99 €![Compulsory Iranian insurance law: Accidents caused by vehicles]( "Compulsory Iranian insurance law: Accidents caused by vehicles")
Compulsory Iranian insurance law: Accidents caused by vehicles26,99 €![Ex post facto law]( "Ex post facto law")
Ex post facto law22,99 €![Political Crime in the Iranian Legal System]( "Political Crime in the Iranian Legal System")
Political Crime in the Iranian Legal System26,99 €
High Quality Content by WIKIPEDIA articles! On May 19, 2006, the National Post of Canada published pieces by Amir Taheri and Chris Wattie falsely claiming that the Iranian parliament had passed a sumptuary law mandating a national dress code for all Iranians, Muslim and non-Muslim alike. Both National Post articles went on to say that non-Muslim religious minorities in Iran would be required to wear "special insignia": yellow for Jews, red for Christians and blue for Zoroastrian. According to the article by Taheri, "[t]he new codes would enable Muslims to easily recognize non-Muslims so that they can avoid shaking hands with them by mistake, and thus becoming najis (unclean)." According to both articles, Iranian Muslims would have to wear "standard Islamic garments".