Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Leveraging Traditional Battle Damage Assessment Procedures to Measure Eects From A Computer Network Attack]( "Leveraging Traditional Battle Damage Assessment Procedures to Measure Eects From A Computer Network Attack")
Leveraging Traditional Battle Damage Assessment Procedures to Measure Eects From A Computer Network Attack63,99 €![Assessing Airpower's Effects: Capabilities and Limitations of Real-Time Battle Damage Assessment]( "Assessing Airpower's Effects: Capabilities and Limitations of Real-Time Battle Damage Assessment")
Assessing Airpower's Effects: Capabilities and Limitations of Real-Time Battle Damage Assessment61,99 €![Assessing Airpower's Effects: Capabilities and Limitations of Real-Time Battle Damage Assessment]( "Assessing Airpower's Effects: Capabilities and Limitations of Real-Time Battle Damage Assessment")
Assessing Airpower's Effects: Capabilities and Limitations of Real-Time Battle Damage Assessment60,99 €![Prepositioned Trailers for Aircraft Battle Damage Repair Support]( "Prepositioned Trailers for Aircraft Battle Damage Repair Support")
Prepositioned Trailers for Aircraft Battle Damage Repair Support60,99 €![Information System Incidents: The Development of a Damage Assessment Model]( "Information System Incidents: The Development of a Damage Assessment Model")
Information System Incidents: The Development of a Damage Assessment Model61,99 €![A Study to Determine Damage Assessment Methods or Models on Air Force Networks]( "A Study to Determine Damage Assessment Methods or Models on Air Force Networks")
A Study to Determine Damage Assessment Methods or Models on Air Force Networks60,99 €![Bullets, Bombs, and Bystanders: The Strategic Implications of Collateral Damage in Afghanistan]( "Bullets, Bombs, and Bystanders: The Strategic Implications of Collateral Damage in Afghanistan")
Bullets, Bombs, and Bystanders: The Strategic Implications of Collateral Damage in Afghanistan60,99 €
Operations since Desert Storm continue to point out weaknesses. We present a review of the Phase I BDA decision, or physical damage assessment, and model the decision process using a Bayesian belief network. Through subject matter expert (i.e., the targeteers) elicitation sessions, imagery was found to be critically important to the BDA process yet this information is generally not retained. This use of "perfect information" is delineated in the BDA process models. We proposed a methodology based on Bayesian belief networks for incorporating this perfect information. We demonstrate the Bayesian belief network's capability to update conditional probability distributions using data generated in real world operations. This capability allows the network's conditional distributions to evolve, increasing model accuracy and reducing uncertainty in the decision.
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.