Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![PMESII and the Non-State Actor: Questioning the Relevance]( "PMESII and the Non-State Actor: Questioning the Relevance")
PMESII and the Non-State Actor: Questioning the Relevance60,99 €![Questioning History]( "Questioning History")
Questioning History35,99 €![Toward the Future of Theater Airlift Doctrine: Case Studies of Theater Airlift Doctrine in Operation Uphold Democracy and Operation Joint Endeavor]( "Toward the Future of Theater Airlift Doctrine: Case Studies of Theater Airlift Doctrine in Operation Uphold Democracy and Operation Joint Endeavor")
Toward the Future of Theater Airlift Doctrine: Case Studies of Theater Airlift Doctrine in Operation Uphold Democracy and Operation Joint Endeavor60,99 €![Future Shock: A Case for the B-2 Bomber]( "Future Shock: A Case for the B-2 Bomber")
Future Shock: A Case for the B-2 Bomber61,99 €![Now That's a Good Question!: How to Promote Cognitive Rigor Through Classroom Questioning]( "Now That's a Good Question!: How to Promote Cognitive Rigor Through Classroom Questioning")
Now That's a Good Question!: How to Promote Cognitive Rigor Through Classroom Questioning26,99 €![The Influence of Politics, Technology, and Asia on the Future of Us Missile Defense]( "The Influence of Politics, Technology, and Asia on the Future of Us Missile Defense")
The Influence of Politics, Technology, and Asia on the Future of Us Missile Defense60,99 €![Does the Future Engineer Force Transition Engineer Units Between Offensive and Stability Operations in Ways that Achieve Responsiveness, Versatility,]( "Does the Future Engineer Force Transition Engineer Units Between Offensive and Stability Operations in Ways that Achieve Responsiveness, Versatility,")
Does the Future Engineer Force Transition Engineer Units Between Offensive and Stability Operations in Ways that Achieve Responsiveness, Versatility,60,99 €
The question "With the demand for Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (ISR) capabilities and effects at an all time high, is it prudent for the USAF to want to retire the U-2S high altitude reconnaissance aircraft and rely solely on the Global Hawk Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) for high altitude ISR support?" is the premise of this paper. This paper questions the motives of USAF leaders in their decision to retire the U-2 and attempts to provide reasonable and logical answers. At times, the evidence supports a disturbing view of USAF intentions. The paper demonstrates how the historical example of keeping and investing in the A-10 allowed the Air Force to reverse directions and benefit the warfighter, a situation with many parallels to the U-2 debate of today. This paper recommends investing in new hardware for the U-2 and how changing tactics, techniques and procedures can make it a more lethal and more effective weapon system. If the Air Force is successful in retiring the U-2, this paper recommends transferring the U-2 to the U.S. Army. The research used to support the ideas in this paper comes from books, magazines, on-line articles and assorted government documents.