This book exhibits a collection of proposals for how school curriculum may be conceived, designed, and realized. These proposals are drawn from writers both past and present who have presented some particular vision of what curriculum could be like for Pre-K--12 schools and have sought to convince others to adopt their proposal for use in some actual school situation. The proposals differ from one another in a variety of ways, including in their purposes, their contents, and their perspectives, and thus pose a wealth of options for consideration by those who are planning to change their school…mehr
This book exhibits a collection of proposals for how school curriculum may be conceived, designed, and realized. These proposals are drawn from writers both past and present who have presented some particular vision of what curriculum could be like for Pre-K--12 schools and have sought to convince others to adopt their proposal for use in some actual school situation. The proposals differ from one another in a variety of ways, including in their purposes, their contents, and their perspectives, and thus pose a wealth of options for consideration by those who are planning to change their school curriculum to something new and more suitable for their particular clientele. Readers will need to weigh the appeal of various proposals presented here against criteria they have for locating an optimum model for their particular situation. The proposals selected for inclusion in this book address the whole of the curriculum-all levels, all subjects, all age-groups; they deal with entire program change rather than with incidental changes in content, program arrangements, teaching approaches, or other limited alterations. This book is intended to be a useful resource for those responsible for making decisions in a particular school or school district or at a broader policy-making level, about what the entire curriculum should be and should include. It draws attention to the work of many thoughtful persons who have dealt with the issue of what a coherent curriculum might be like and who, in some instances, have set up actual programs based on their ideas.Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.
Edmund C. Short is Professor Emeritus of Education, The Pennsylvania State University, and is currently Graduate Faculty Associate, University of Central Florida. His professional career has focused primarily on curriculum planning, design, theory, and research.
Inhaltsangabe
Foreword Preface Introduction Part One-Curriculum Proposals from the Past and Present Academic-Focused Coherent Proposals 1. Adler (1982) 2. Broudy Smith Burnett (1964 3. Chaucer (2012) 4. Egan (1997) 5. Gardner (1999) 6. King Brownell (1966) 7. Phenix (1964) 8. Academic-Focused Partial Proposals Bennett (1987) Eisner (1982) Gardner (2008) Hirsch (1988) Koerner (1959) Parker Rubin (1966) Reid (1980) 9. Democracy-Focused Coherent Proposals Beane (1997) 10. Hopkins (1941) 11. White (1991) 12. Democracy-Focused Partial Proposals Banks (2019) Brameld (1945) Educational Policies Commission (1938). Goodlad Lovitt (1993) Grant (2012) McLaren (2007) Miller (2002) Newmann (1975) Rebell (2018) 13. Global-Focused Coherent Proposals Goodlad (1974) 14. O'Sullivan (1999) 15. Global-Focused Partial Proposals Braus Wood (1994) Robinson (2015) Santone (2019) Waks (2014) 16. Living-Focused Coherent Proposals James (1972) 17. Prensky (2016) 18. Stratemeyer Forkner McKIm Passow (1947) 19. Totten Manley (1969) 20. Weinstein Fantini (1970) 21. Living-Focused Partial Proposals Battelle For Kids (2019) Bremer (1975) Federal Security Agency (1951) Ontario DOE (1968) Rubin (1969) Rugg (1936) Person-Focused Coherent Proposals 22. Berman (1968) 23. Costa Liebmann (1997) 24. Doll (1993) 25. Frymier (1973) 26. Macdonald Wolfson Zaret (1973) 27. Miller (2007) 28. Person-Focused Partial Proposals; Barrow (1984) Beane Lipka (1984) Bookewalter (2003) Cole (1972) Davis (1971) Eble (1966) Ergas (2017) Goodson (2014) Jones Bouffard (2012) Kilpatrick (1931) Kline (1971) Leonard (1968) Parker (1963) Pinar (1975) Postman Weingartner (1973) Pritzkau (1971) Rogers (1983) Weiss Moran Cottle (1975) Zhoa (2018 29. Problem-Focused Coherent Proposals; Collins (2017) 30. Faunce Bossing (1958) 31. Pearl (1972) 32. Scriven (1972) 33. Sizer (1992) 34. Thelen (1972) 35. Problem-Focused Partial Proposals; Ammons (1969) Bowers (1974) Hopkins (1994) Marsh Codding (1999) Miel (1969) Miller (2018) Murname Levy (1996) Perkins (1986) Raup Axtelle Benne Smith (1962) Swartwood (2013) Wasserman (2018) 36. Values-Focused Coherent Proposals; Noddings (1992) 37. Phenix (1961) 38. Purpel (1989) 39. Vandenberg (1990) 40. Values-Focused Partial Proposals; Boyer (1995) Egan Cant Judson (2013) Frazier (1980) Hantzopoulos (2016) Kimball McClellan (1962) Miller (2000) Smits Naqvi (2015) Ulich (1965) Part Two -Practical Assistance for Creating a Total Curriculum Chapter 41: Program From a Curriculum Proposal Choosing a Viable Curriculum Proposal on Which to Base an Actual Curriculum Chapter 42: Grasping the Place of Curriculum within Historical and Contextual Realities Finding Guidance on the Curriculum Design Process Itself Assuring Coherence in the Curriculum Design and Programmatic Features References Part Three-How To Use This Book Appendix A: References Giving What Earlier Curriculum Authorities Said Would Be Needed in Future Curricula