Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Global and Capable Quality Management]( "Global and Capable Quality Management")
Global and Capable Quality Management27,95 €![To what extent does the balance scorecard approach influence both performance appraisal and strategic management?]( "To what extent does the balance scorecard approach influence both performance appraisal and strategic management?")
To what extent does the balance scorecard approach influence both performance appraisal and strategic management?18,95 €![Long-Term Requirements for Leadership in the Context of Increased Diversity. Is There a New Importance to Face Cultural Diversity?]( "Long-Term Requirements for Leadership in the Context of Increased Diversity. Is There a New Importance to Face Cultural Diversity?")
Long-Term Requirements for Leadership in the Context of Increased Diversity. Is There a New Importance to Face Cultural Diversity?18,95 €![Is there a need to rethink leadership as digitization continues to grow?]( "Is there a need to rethink leadership as digitization continues to grow?")
Is there a need to rethink leadership as digitization continues to grow?18,95 €![Multiculturalism - Is there a crisis?]( "Multiculturalism - Is there a crisis?")
Multiculturalism - Is there a crisis?18,95 €![Ebay's approach towards organisational learning]( "Ebay's approach towards organisational learning")
Ebay's approach towards organisational learning17,95 €![Case Study: PeoplePC: Is there a free lunch?]( "Case Study: PeoplePC: Is there a free lunch?")
Case Study: PeoplePC: Is there a free lunch?14,99 €
Seminar paper from the year 2005 in the subject Business economics - Business Management, Corporate Governance, grade: sehr gut, University of St. Gallen, course: Doktoranden- (PhD) Seminar, language: English, abstract: Most literature on international R&D has employed a static and MNC-centered view, assuming some kind of evolutionary process by which R&D activities are internationalized, typically with some labs adapting products to local markets first, and whole research facilities being implemented on a world-wide basis last to finally profit from a "global innovation network". This article challenges such a view, asking for a thorough and critical investigation. It will be shown that there are many counter-examples questioning the traditional view of evolutionary development and "optimal" organization that hovers around the "centralisation - decentralisation" dichotomy. Instead, a look on several contingency effects and empirical phenomena is proposed to gain interesting insights as to the limitations of many traditional models. The case of China's economic emergence provides a final illustration for these arguments. The conclusion shows how theoretical concepts known from other disciplines may serve as an analytical framework that can take into account more aptly the developments alluded.