Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Keshab Chandra Sen and the Brahma Samáj: Being a Brief Review of Indian Theism From 1830 to 1884]( "Keshab Chandra Sen and the Brahma Samáj: Being a Brief Review of Indian Theism From 1830 to 1884")
Keshab Chandra Sen and the Brahma Samáj: Being a Brief Review of Indian Theism From 1830 to 188441,99 €![An Introduction to the Philosophy of Bernard Lonergan]( "An Introduction to the Philosophy of Bernard Lonergan")
An Introduction to the Philosophy of Bernard Lonergan68,99 €![Bringing Bernard Lonergan Down to Earth and into Our Hearts and Communities]( "Bringing Bernard Lonergan Down to Earth and into Our Hearts and Communities")
Bringing Bernard Lonergan Down to Earth and into Our Hearts and Communities41,99 €![Bringing Bernard Lonergan Down to Earth and into Our Hearts and Communities]( "Bringing Bernard Lonergan Down to Earth and into Our Hearts and Communities")
Bringing Bernard Lonergan Down to Earth and into Our Hearts and Communities27,99 €![Wal¿ya as a response to the self-other dichotomy in European philosophy]( "Wal¿ya as a response to the self-other dichotomy in European philosophy")
Wal¿ya as a response to the self-other dichotomy in European philosophy17,95 €![A Review of the Systems of Ethics Founded on the Theory of Evolution]( "A Review of the Systems of Ethics Founded on the Theory of Evolution")
A Review of the Systems of Ethics Founded on the Theory of Evolution32,99 €![The Adam Smith Review]( "The Adam Smith Review")
The Adam Smith Review202,99 €
Research Paper (undergraduate) from the year 2017 in the subject Philosophy - Miscellaneous, grade: 4.00, Indiana University (College of Arts and Sciences - Philosophy Department), course: PHIL-P300 Philosophical Writing Methods, language: English, abstract: In his essay "The Self and the Future," Bernard Williams conveys two formulations of a thought experiment designed both to clarify the issue of personal identity over time while also revealing the keen methodological limitations of philosophical thought experiments in objectively overriding our intuitions. In this paper, the author seeks to analyze Williams' conclusions of both experiments and determine that one formulation suffers from weaknesses in its semantic and structure that make it indefensible relative to the other more tenable interpretation. Furthermore the author concludes that while the comparison of the two thought experiments in Williams' paper leads to much needed skepticism on the role of thought experiments,that the second formulation Williams' proposes is nonetheless reveals a sound possible basis for personal identity over time.
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.