Jasser Auda's clear and brave views on abrogation in the Islamic tradition challenge orthodoxy and dogma in favor of flexibility and practical implication.
Jasser Auda's clear and brave views on abrogation in the Islamic tradition challenge orthodoxy and dogma in favor of flexibility and practical implication.
Dr. Jasser Auda is ¿the Executive Chairman of the Maqasid Institute, a global think tank based in London, and a Visiting Professor of Islamic Law at Carleton University in Canada. He is a Founding and Board Member of the International Union of Muslim Scholars, member of the European Council for Fatwa and Research, Member of the Fiqh Council of North America, Al-Shatibi Chair of Maqasid Studies at the International Peace College South Africa, Fellow of the Islamic Fiqh Academy of India, and General Secretary of Yaqazat Feker, a popular youth organization in Egypt. He has written 25 books in Arabic and English.
Inhaltsangabe
Table of Contents Introduction Chapter One: Objectives of Islamic Law: Concepts and Aims Chapter Two: Internal Contradiction or Mutual Exclusion by a Scholar 2.1 Mutual exclusion or contradiction 2.2 Contradiction between texts 2.3 Ways of dealing with superficial contradiction Chapter Three: Abrogation: Definitions and Uses 3.1 Linguistic and technical definitions 3.2 The limitation, exception or interpretation of an earlier text by a later one 3.3 Abrogation as meaning final annulment of a religious ruling Chapter Four: A Critique of Some Methodologies Confirming Abrogation 4.1 Is there any definitive evidence of the abrogation of any Qur’anic verses? 4.2 Contradiction as evidence for abrogation 4.3 Abrogation on the basis of dates: Are we required to adopt the latest? 4.4 No abrogation based on anyone’s personal opinion 4.5 What does ‘express’ abrogation mean? Is it enough to prohibit something after it was permissible, or to permit it after it was prohibited? Chapter Five: Cases of How Objectives Help in the Enforcement of Superficially Contradictory Texts 5.1 Objectives of protecting the approved essentials by the Muslim government 5.2 The objective of making things easier through a gradual implementation of Islamic laws 5.3 Striking the balance between the objectives of worship and keeping things easy 5.4 Balancing the objectives of human beings’ safety and protecting the environment Theoretical and Practical Conclusions Bibliography Index
Table of Contents Introduction Chapter One: Objectives of Islamic Law: Concepts and Aims Chapter Two: Internal Contradiction or Mutual Exclusion by a Scholar 2.1 Mutual exclusion or contradiction 2.2 Contradiction between texts 2.3 Ways of dealing with superficial contradiction Chapter Three: Abrogation: Definitions and Uses 3.1 Linguistic and technical definitions 3.2 The limitation, exception or interpretation of an earlier text by a later one 3.3 Abrogation as meaning final annulment of a religious ruling Chapter Four: A Critique of Some Methodologies Confirming Abrogation 4.1 Is there any definitive evidence of the abrogation of any Qur’anic verses? 4.2 Contradiction as evidence for abrogation 4.3 Abrogation on the basis of dates: Are we required to adopt the latest? 4.4 No abrogation based on anyone’s personal opinion 4.5 What does ‘express’ abrogation mean? Is it enough to prohibit something after it was permissible, or to permit it after it was prohibited? Chapter Five: Cases of How Objectives Help in the Enforcement of Superficially Contradictory Texts 5.1 Objectives of protecting the approved essentials by the Muslim government 5.2 The objective of making things easier through a gradual implementation of Islamic laws 5.3 Striking the balance between the objectives of worship and keeping things easy 5.4 Balancing the objectives of human beings’ safety and protecting the environment Theoretical and Practical Conclusions Bibliography Index
Es gelten unsere Allgemeinen Geschäftsbedingungen: www.buecher.de/agb
Impressum
www.buecher.de ist ein Shop der buecher.de GmbH & Co. KG Bürgermeister-Wegele-Str. 12, 86167 Augsburg Amtsgericht Augsburg HRA 13309
