Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![A Kill Is a Kill: Asymmetrically Attacking U.S. Airpower]( "A Kill Is a Kill: Asymmetrically Attacking U.S. Airpower")
A Kill Is a Kill: Asymmetrically Attacking U.S. Airpower60,99 €![Airpower in the Kill Box: Fire Support Coordination and Airspace Deconfliction in the Future Nonlinear Battlespace]( "Airpower in the Kill Box: Fire Support Coordination and Airspace Deconfliction in the Future Nonlinear Battlespace")
Airpower in the Kill Box: Fire Support Coordination and Airspace Deconfliction in the Future Nonlinear Battlespace62,99 €![Attacking the United States with Unmanned Aerial Vehicle-Borne Radiological Weapons in 2035: Feasibilty and Deterrence]( "Attacking the United States with Unmanned Aerial Vehicle-Borne Radiological Weapons in 2035: Feasibilty and Deterrence")
Attacking the United States with Unmanned Aerial Vehicle-Borne Radiological Weapons in 2035: Feasibilty and Deterrence60,99 €![More Than Bombing Saddam: Attacking the Leadership in Operation Iraqi Freedom]( "More Than Bombing Saddam: Attacking the Leadership in Operation Iraqi Freedom")
More Than Bombing Saddam: Attacking the Leadership in Operation Iraqi Freedom61,99 €![Bringing the Box Into Doctrine: Joint Doctrine and the Kill Box]( "Bringing the Box Into Doctrine: Joint Doctrine and the Kill Box")
Bringing the Box Into Doctrine: Joint Doctrine and the Kill Box60,99 €![Accelerating The Kill Chain Via Future Unmanned Aircraft]( "Accelerating The Kill Chain Via Future Unmanned Aircraft")
Accelerating The Kill Chain Via Future Unmanned Aircraft63,99 €![An Indirect Approach to Warfare: Attacking an Enemy's Moral Forces]( "An Indirect Approach to Warfare: Attacking an Enemy's Moral Forces")
An Indirect Approach to Warfare: Attacking an Enemy's Moral Forces62,99 €
As the Twentieth Century closes, efforts towards organizing, training, and equipping U.S. airpower assets remain based on the assumption of face-to-face conventional confrontations. This is a comforting hypothesis, as U.S. technological superiority should keep the odds stacked in our favor for decades to come. Air strategists may be overlooking the fact, however, that this very technological superiority may force adversaries to counter U.S. airpower with other than conventional methods. Couple this with the strong possibility that the interests of the U.S. and our opponents will likely be found on opposite ends of the spectrum of war, and U.S. airpower could be in for some surprises. This study analyzes the asymmetric threat to U.S. airpower across the political, operational, and tactical levels of war and examines whether the U.S. has adequately prepared itself to counter asymmetrical measures against its airpower assets. The answers are not reassuring. U.S. airpower is not likely to overwhelming technological capability by increasing friction levels and changing our visions of surgical warfare into an attrition reality. They will attempt to inflict "virtual attrition" as well by changing U.S. targeting strategies and reducing our effectiveness while buying themselves time to attain their objectives. In this respect, U.S. airpower can be strategically defeated.
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.