Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Follow and Assume: The Operational Reserve in Security, Stability, Reconstruction, and Transition Operations]( "Follow and Assume: The Operational Reserve in Security, Stability, Reconstruction, and Transition Operations")
Follow and Assume: The Operational Reserve in Security, Stability, Reconstruction, and Transition Operations60,99 €![Is the Army Reserve an Operational Force, a Strategic Reserve, or a Mix of Both?]( "Is the Army Reserve an Operational Force, a Strategic Reserve, or a Mix of Both?")
Is the Army Reserve an Operational Force, a Strategic Reserve, or a Mix of Both?60,99 €![How Can the Department of Defense (Dod) Minimize the Impact on the Reservists' Civilian Employers in Order to Maintain an Operational Reserve Componen]( "How Can the Department of Defense (Dod) Minimize the Impact on the Reservists' Civilian Employers in Order to Maintain an Operational Reserve Componen")
How Can the Department of Defense (Dod) Minimize the Impact on the Reservists' Civilian Employers in Order to Maintain an Operational Reserve Componen60,99 €![Considerations for the Organization and Employment of an Operational Reserve]( "Considerations for the Organization and Employment of an Operational Reserve")
Considerations for the Organization and Employment of an Operational Reserve60,99 €![Supporting Operational National Gaurd's Dual Role: Reconsidering Reserve Component Categories]( "Supporting Operational National Gaurd's Dual Role: Reconsidering Reserve Component Categories")
Supporting Operational National Gaurd's Dual Role: Reconsidering Reserve Component Categories60,99 €![Army Reserve Component Restructure: Does the Canadian Model Have Validity for US Army Reserve Components?]( "Army Reserve Component Restructure: Does the Canadian Model Have Validity for US Army Reserve Components?")
Army Reserve Component Restructure: Does the Canadian Model Have Validity for US Army Reserve Components?60,99 €![Civilian Reserve Air Fleet: Should the USAF Use It Routinely?]( "Civilian Reserve Air Fleet: Should the USAF Use It Routinely?")
Civilian Reserve Air Fleet: Should the USAF Use It Routinely?60,99 €
The 2006 Quadrennial Defense review has mandated Reserve Component Operationalization. The high cost of manpower, combined with the absolute requirement of funding operations, leaves each service little funds for recapitalizing (modernizing) their equipment. Relieving the overwhelming burden personnel places upon service budgets makes it very appealing for the Department of Defense to "cash in" on reserve forces by using them in an increasing operational capacity. Making a reserve force that is operational as well as strategic, however, is difficult because of several legal and logistical problems posed by the "strategiconly"nature of U.S. Codes Title 10 and Title 32.This paper is an executive summary analysis of critical issues pertinent to amending U.S. Code Titles 10 and 32. It does not attempt to propose the exact wording for new legislation, but is rather an analysis of limitations currently imposed by Titles 10 and 32 with respect to operationalization and the effects of these practices on Guardsmen and Reservists and their employers. Looking at the needs of the services, reservists/guardsmen, and their employers, this analysis explores the benefit and pitfalls of operationalization through the adaptation of "operational" reserve units and "operational" reservists/guardsmen. This analysis indicates that legally defined "operational" reserve units and "operational" reservists, in addition to a "strategic" reserve, has the potential to improve force efficiency, and concludes that in order to make this sustainable, a new social compact that guarantees a level of predictably for all involved is required.
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.