Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Do We Need Separate Space Theory: The Lessons of History]( "Do We Need Separate Space Theory: The Lessons of History")
Do We Need Separate Space Theory: The Lessons of History63,99 €![Who Will Command the High Ground?: The Case for a Separate Area of Responsibility for Space]( "Who Will Command the High Ground?: The Case for a Separate Area of Responsibility for Space")
Who Will Command the High Ground?: The Case for a Separate Area of Responsibility for Space64,99 €![Whose Information Is It Anyway? An Argument for Information Stewardship]( "Whose Information Is It Anyway? An Argument for Information Stewardship")
Whose Information Is It Anyway? An Argument for Information Stewardship64,99 €![Reinvigorating the Nuclear Enterprise: Is It Time for a Separate Icbm Career Field?]( "Reinvigorating the Nuclear Enterprise: Is It Time for a Separate Icbm Career Field?")
Reinvigorating the Nuclear Enterprise: Is It Time for a Separate Icbm Career Field?63,99 €![Separate and Unequal: NATO in Afghanistan as a Model for Future Alliance Out of Area Operations]( "Separate and Unequal: NATO in Afghanistan as a Model for Future Alliance Out of Area Operations")
Separate and Unequal: NATO in Afghanistan as a Model for Future Alliance Out of Area Operations64,99 €![Separate Service for Handling Petroleum Supply]( "Separate Service for Handling Petroleum Supply")
Separate Service for Handling Petroleum Supply63,99 €![An Argument and Strategy for Bilateral Talks between the United States and the Democratic People's Republic of Korea]( "An Argument and Strategy for Bilateral Talks between the United States and the Democratic People's Republic of Korea")
An Argument and Strategy for Bilateral Talks between the United States and the Democratic People's Republic of Korea64,99 €
Since the end of the Gulf War, the debate over whether there should be a separate space service, equal with the Air Force, Army, and Navy, has grown in proportion to the indispensable value of space operations to our nation's defense. Increasing dependency on space-systems is a fact of military life. In this well-documented essay, Col Michael C. Whittington compares the leading arguments for a separate space force to the cogent arguments for an independent air force made by airpower advocates during the interwar years of 1920-1940. The airpower issues in 1920 and the space power issues of today are strikingly similar, revolving around four key issues: leadership, doctrine, technology, and funding. The irony, of course, is that these arguments, which helped create an independent air force in 1947, are challenged by many within today's Air Force leadership, which leads Colonel Whittington to ask, "If they were cogent in 1920, would they not be relevant today?"
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.