Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Damage Considerations of a Flexible Micro Air Vehicle Wing Using 3-D Laser Vibrometry]( "Damage Considerations of a Flexible Micro Air Vehicle Wing Using 3-D Laser Vibrometry")
Damage Considerations of a Flexible Micro Air Vehicle Wing Using 3-D Laser Vibrometry61,99 €![Dynamic Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Routing with a Java-Encoded Reactive Tabu Search Metaheuristic]( "Dynamic Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Routing with a Java-Encoded Reactive Tabu Search Metaheuristic")
Dynamic Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Routing with a Java-Encoded Reactive Tabu Search Metaheuristic60,99 €![Attacking the United States with Unmanned Aerial Vehicle-Borne Radiological Weapons in 2035: Feasibilty and Deterrence]( "Attacking the United States with Unmanned Aerial Vehicle-Borne Radiological Weapons in 2035: Feasibilty and Deterrence")
Attacking the United States with Unmanned Aerial Vehicle-Borne Radiological Weapons in 2035: Feasibilty and Deterrence60,99 €![An Investigation into Robust Wind Correction Algorithms for Off-the-Shelf Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Autopilots]( "An Investigation into Robust Wind Correction Algorithms for Off-the-Shelf Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Autopilots")
An Investigation into Robust Wind Correction Algorithms for Off-the-Shelf Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Autopilots62,99 €![Evaluation of an OPNET Model for Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Networks]( "Evaluation of an OPNET Model for Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Networks")
Evaluation of an OPNET Model for Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Networks60,99 €![Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Mission Level Simulation]( "Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Mission Level Simulation")
Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Mission Level Simulation61,99 €![Determining if the United States Military is Ready to Eliminate its Pilots: Use of Combat Unmanned Aerial Vehicle]( "Determining if the United States Military is Ready to Eliminate its Pilots: Use of Combat Unmanned Aerial Vehicle")
Determining if the United States Military is Ready to Eliminate its Pilots: Use of Combat Unmanned Aerial Vehicle63,99 €
The static aeroelastic behavior of the Nighthawk mini unmanned aerial vehicle is examined using acombined experimental and computational approach. Three wings are examined. In order of increasingstiffness they are: a flexible wing, a stiff wing, and a fictitious rigid wing with zero deflection. Photogrammetryis used during wind tunnel testing to measure the average deflected shape of the flexible and stiff wingsduring flight. The independent variables during wind tunnel tests are angle of attack (ranging from -5.1othrough 13.4o) and velocity, which is 20 mph, 30 mph, and 40 mph. Roll angle and yaw angle are controlvariables, held constant at 0o. The measured deflection of each wing is used to adjust the wing shape forcomputational fluid dynamics analysis. Solutions are obtained for the flexible, stiff, and undeflected (or rigid)wings using a steady-state viscous flow solver with a Spalart-Allmaras turbulence model. The flexible andstiff wings experience two forms of deformation during flight. They bend upward along the span increasingthe dihedral, and the leading edge twists downward (wing washout). The amplitude of deflection is greatestfor the flexible wing. As a result, the flexible wing is more stable, but also exhibits worse static aerodynamicperformance. The rigid wing has the greatest lift (CL max=1.29) and the highest lift-to-drag ratio (L/Dmax =10.2).Stall occurs first near the root for all three wings. None of the wings stall at the tip in the range of angles ofattack tested. A separation bubble forms under the wing at angles of attack less than 8o. This separationdecreases the overall lift. It is most prominent on the flexible wing.
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.