Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Commentary on the Principle of Non-Refoulement in Refugee Law]( "Commentary on the Principle of Non-Refoulement in Refugee Law")
Commentary on the Principle of Non-Refoulement in Refugee Law36,99 €![Justice in the Wake of Disobedience of Court Orders by the Kenyan Legislature: A Threat to the Principle of Seperation of Powers in the Constitution?]( "Justice in the Wake of Disobedience of Court Orders by the Kenyan Legislature: A Threat to the Principle of Seperation of Powers in the Constitution?")
Justice in the Wake of Disobedience of Court Orders by the Kenyan Legislature: A Threat to the Principle of Seperation of Powers in the Constitution?26,99 €![The Refugee and Non-refoulement obligation]( "The Refugee and Non-refoulement obligation")
The Refugee and Non-refoulement obligation29,99 €![Insurance Versus the Principle of Utmost Good Faith in Cameroon]( "Insurance Versus the Principle of Utmost Good Faith in Cameroon")
Insurance Versus the Principle of Utmost Good Faith in Cameroon53,99 €![A Treatise on the Principle of Primacy of EU law]( "A Treatise on the Principle of Primacy of EU law")
A Treatise on the Principle of Primacy of EU law50,99 €![Applicability of the Principle of Legality to the Crime of Genocide]( "Applicability of the Principle of Legality to the Crime of Genocide")
Applicability of the Principle of Legality to the Crime of Genocide26,99 €![Balancing National Security and Non-Refoulement?]( "Balancing National Security and Non-Refoulement?")
Balancing National Security and Non-Refoulement?32,99 €
Non-refoulement constitutes one of the most fundamental principles of international human rights and refugee law as it prohibits expulsion of third-country nationals to another state where they are at a real risk of facing torture. However, this principle appears to be fragile when interpreted by international bodies. This article will examine the different shaping of the interpretation of the principle of non-refoulment, aiming to identify which one is prevailing today. Primarily, the article will analyze the impacts brought to the interpretation of the principle by the lack of a common international definition and how this has led to a more flexible application of an absolute prohibition. To capture the absolute nature of the principle, this article will also study the danger a third-country national can constitute to the national security of the host country and the practice of diplomatic assurances as legitimate exemptions and therefore, conclude to which extend the principleremains intact from exceptions or not. The above observations will be made by referencing relevant international and European case law.