Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Reforming the Military's Force Management and Retirement Systems: Are Longer Careers the Answer?]( "Reforming the Military's Force Management and Retirement Systems: Are Longer Careers the Answer?")
Reforming the Military's Force Management and Retirement Systems: Are Longer Careers the Answer?60,99 €![Naval Special Warfare Reserve Force: Reorganization and Strategic Employment for Integration and Support of the Active Component]( "Naval Special Warfare Reserve Force: Reorganization and Strategic Employment for Integration and Support of the Active Component")
Naval Special Warfare Reserve Force: Reorganization and Strategic Employment for Integration and Support of the Active Component60,99 €![Does the NATO Decision Process Support the Rapid Response Capabilities of the NATO Response Force?]( "Does the NATO Decision Process Support the Rapid Response Capabilities of the NATO Response Force?")
Does the NATO Decision Process Support the Rapid Response Capabilities of the NATO Response Force?60,99 €![European Union's Rapid Reaction Force and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Response Force: A Rational Division of Labor for European Security]( "European Union's Rapid Reaction Force and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Response Force: A Rational Division of Labor for European Security")
European Union's Rapid Reaction Force and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Response Force: A Rational Division of Labor for European Security60,99 €![Rapid Response in the Homeland]( "Rapid Response in the Homeland")
Rapid Response in the Homeland60,99 €![Disruptive Breakthroughs and the USAF: Is Strategic Airlift's Rapid Crisis Response Capability a Potential Target of Terrorism?]( "Disruptive Breakthroughs and the USAF: Is Strategic Airlift's Rapid Crisis Response Capability a Potential Target of Terrorism?")
Disruptive Breakthroughs and the USAF: Is Strategic Airlift's Rapid Crisis Response Capability a Potential Target of Terrorism?60,99 €![Assessing the Effects of Bush Administration National Security Policy on the Air Force Active/Reserve Component Mix]( "Assessing the Effects of Bush Administration National Security Policy on the Air Force Active/Reserve Component Mix")
Assessing the Effects of Bush Administration National Security Policy on the Air Force Active/Reserve Component Mix60,99 €
Since September 11, 2001 (9/11) heavy emphasis has been placed on securing the United States and its interests from terrorism. However, little emphasis has been placed on the importance of efficient and effective response to incidents of national significance that do not fall into the realm of terrorist activity. Future references to an incident of national significance will be assumed to be natural vice terrorist related unless otherwise stated. Chemical, Biological, Radiological, Nuclear, or Explosive (CBRNE) attacks or attacks against national security nodes are beyond the scope of this project. The events of Hurricane Katrina brought to light significant response and recovery issues associated with emergency situations within the Continental United States (CONUS) and the efficiency of the federal military actions associated with incident of this magnitude. Through April 2006 the mainstay of guidance for the use of active military forces (Title 10) has been Department of Defense (DoD) Directive 3025.15 Military Assistance to Civil Authorities (MSCA). This directive includes a myriad of enclosures and supporting documents which outline when, where and to what extent active military personnel can assist or support civil authorities. In an effort to streamline this effort MSCA is currently under revision and will soon be published as Defense Support of Civil Authorities (DSCA - FINAL-FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY, Pre-Decisional). This new document attempts, in the researcher's opinion, to mitigate some of the recurring issues with the use of active component forces and to provide a more succinct document as foundation for a more efficient use of these forces.