121,99 €
inkl. MwSt.
Versandkostenfrei*
Erscheint vorauss. 22. April 2030
Melden Sie sich für den Produktalarm an, um über die Verfügbarkeit des Produkts informiert zu werden.

payback
61 °P sammeln
  • Gebundenes Buch

This book applies the regime politics model to analyze how a court of final appeal tends to operate within the broader political system. Focusing on Australia's High Court in the late 1980s and 90s, it examines how the court exercises judicial power and what happens when its decisions and methods run counter or challenge the government. It also enables assessment of where and how changes occur in substantive law, workload, and interactions with other branches of government. Ultimately, the book affirms the claims of regime politics scholarship that courts cannot stray for long from the…mehr

Produktbeschreibung
This book applies the regime politics model to analyze how a court of final appeal tends to operate within the broader political system. Focusing on Australia's High Court in the late 1980s and 90s, it examines how the court exercises judicial power and what happens when its decisions and methods run counter or challenge the government. It also enables assessment of where and how changes occur in substantive law, workload, and interactions with other branches of government. Ultimately, the book affirms the claims of regime politics scholarship that courts cannot stray for long from the dominant political regime's values and commitments, lest the regime invoke its tools to bring compliance.
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.
Autorenporträt
Rebecca Gill is assistant professor of political science at the University of Nevada Las Vegas, USA. She coded the High Court of Australia cases for the National Science Foundation-funded High Courts Judicial Database, which consists of over thirty years of data for 10 countries. In addition to her work analyzing the High Court, she also studies judicial decision-making and institutions in the American states and cross-nationally. She has published widely on issues relating to judicial decision-making. Jason Pierce is associate professor of political science and interim dean of the College of Arts and Sciences at the University of Dayton, USA. His research focuses on the comparative study of courts and constitutional rights, particularly the Australian system. He is the author of books and numerous journal articles on courts and constitutional rights. David L. Weiden is assistant professor of Political Science at Metropolitan State University of Denver, USA. His work examines the comparative study of judicial systems, and he has previously published work on the high courts of Australia, Canada, and Northern Ireland.