Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![American Fear]( "American Fear")
American Fear236,99 €![American Isolationism Between the World Wars]( "American Isolationism Between the World Wars")
American Isolationism Between the World Wars194,99 €![Collateral Damage]( "Collateral Damage")
Collateral Damage205,99 €![The Truth of History]( "The Truth of History")
The Truth of History38,99 €![A Theory of History]( "A Theory of History")
A Theory of History42,99 €![Wax Tablets of the Mind]( "Wax Tablets of the Mind")
Wax Tablets of the Mind42,99 €![Government and Society in France]( "Government and Society in France")
Government and Society in France27,99 €
Against Aid presents a complex and diverse history of opposition to US foreign aid spending, explaining why critics challenged aid and how they had a significant impact on US foreign policy.
Foreign aid was an integral part of US foreign policy during the Cold War. US leaders hoped aid spending could modernize other societies, create steadfast allies, and promote global stability, but there was always considerable opposition. Jeffrey F. Taffet skillfully examines aid's opponents and shows how they questioned the assumptions that the United States needed to be globally engaged. He argues that aid's opponents forced changes in US aid programs that dramatically reduced overall spending and limited support for dictatorships. Taffet also makes a larger argument, that in fighting aid, opponents were challenging essential views about the nation and its global role that transcended debates about how much to spend. They were arguing about the appropriate use of nationalpower and the essence of the nation's purpose.
This book is essential reading for courses in American politics, international studies, and history of American foreign policy. Students will benefit from the broad, chronological scope and accessible narrative of the text.
Foreign aid was an integral part of US foreign policy during the Cold War. US leaders hoped aid spending could modernize other societies, create steadfast allies, and promote global stability, but there was always considerable opposition. Jeffrey F. Taffet skillfully examines aid's opponents and shows how they questioned the assumptions that the United States needed to be globally engaged. He argues that aid's opponents forced changes in US aid programs that dramatically reduced overall spending and limited support for dictatorships. Taffet also makes a larger argument, that in fighting aid, opponents were challenging essential views about the nation and its global role that transcended debates about how much to spend. They were arguing about the appropriate use of nationalpower and the essence of the nation's purpose.
This book is essential reading for courses in American politics, international studies, and history of American foreign policy. Students will benefit from the broad, chronological scope and accessible narrative of the text.
"Taffet's accessible and engaging study convincingly demonstrates that many Americans rejected the notion that US foreign aid during the Cold War could strengthen other societies or benefit the United States. Illuminating fierce legislative battles that frequently cut across party lines, Against Aid shows how opponents of foreign aid questioned the assumptions of American Cold War leadership, laying the foundation for current debates about US global engagement."
William Michael Schmidli, Associate Professor of History, Leiden University, The Netherlands
"Whether foreign aid achieves its stated goals is an open question among scholars and even among its proponents. Jeffrey Taffet shows that its skeptics rooted their doubts in a variety of soils, and their opposition to foreign aid reflected conflicting visions of the national mission in the latter half of the 'American Century.' This is a valuable volume, and is essential reading for anyone seeking to understand the 'soft power' of foreign aid in postwar American diplomacy."
Jason C. Parker, Professor of History, Texas A&M University, USA
"What is the ultimate purpose of US foreign relations? To vigorously spread US-style freedoms and democracy around the globe, and shoulder the responsibility that comes with that choice? Or pursue narrowly construed, specific US interests, cautiously avoiding possible foreign entanglements? Although the debate goes back nearly two centuries, today the conflict over foreign aid is arguably the best way of understanding it. As such, the enduring relevance of Jeffrey Taffet's excellently researched, well-written book is clear."
James F. Siekmeier, Associate Professor of History, West Virginia University, USA
William Michael Schmidli, Associate Professor of History, Leiden University, The Netherlands
"Whether foreign aid achieves its stated goals is an open question among scholars and even among its proponents. Jeffrey Taffet shows that its skeptics rooted their doubts in a variety of soils, and their opposition to foreign aid reflected conflicting visions of the national mission in the latter half of the 'American Century.' This is a valuable volume, and is essential reading for anyone seeking to understand the 'soft power' of foreign aid in postwar American diplomacy."
Jason C. Parker, Professor of History, Texas A&M University, USA
"What is the ultimate purpose of US foreign relations? To vigorously spread US-style freedoms and democracy around the globe, and shoulder the responsibility that comes with that choice? Or pursue narrowly construed, specific US interests, cautiously avoiding possible foreign entanglements? Although the debate goes back nearly two centuries, today the conflict over foreign aid is arguably the best way of understanding it. As such, the enduring relevance of Jeffrey Taffet's excellently researched, well-written book is clear."
James F. Siekmeier, Associate Professor of History, West Virginia University, USA