Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Coping Strategies in Individuals in an Active Drug Use Phase]( "Coping Strategies in Individuals in an Active Drug Use Phase")
Coping Strategies in Individuals in an Active Drug Use Phase29,99 €![Stress, Stressors and Coping Strategies]( "Stress, Stressors and Coping Strategies")
Stress, Stressors and Coping Strategies32,99 €![Spatial Strategies]( "Spatial Strategies")
Spatial Strategies38,99 €![Perceived Stress and Coping Strategies among Adama University Students]( "Perceived Stress and Coping Strategies among Adama University Students")
Perceived Stress and Coping Strategies among Adama University Students32,99 €![Individual Difference Effects on Negotiation Strategies and Outcomes:]( "Individual Difference Effects on Negotiation Strategies and Outcomes:")
Individual Difference Effects on Negotiation Strategies and Outcomes:32,99 €![Effects of Compensation Strategies on The Culture of Nonprofits]( "Effects of Compensation Strategies on The Culture of Nonprofits")
Effects of Compensation Strategies on The Culture of Nonprofits32,99 €![Verbal Fluency Task in Alzheimer's disease]( "Verbal Fluency Task in Alzheimer's disease")
Verbal Fluency Task in Alzheimer's disease36,99 €
The purpose of this book was twofold: (a) to
associate age-related performance deficits in
younger children with the use of recall strategies,
and (b) to determine whether children who performed
poorly in the motor skill would benefit from
learning to apply a recall strategy. Two experiments
were conducted. In Experiment 1, younger children (5-
7 years) and older children (8-10 years) were asked
to recall selected pedaling cadences. Strategy was
assessed by questioning the children immediately
following the recall. In this experiment the
majority of the older children used strategies,
while the younger children did not. Children who
used strategies performed with less error than the
children who did not. In Experiment 2 then, children
with high errors in Experiment 1 were assigned to an
experimental or a control group. The children in the
experimental group were taught to use a specific
strategy to assist their recall. The results showed
that children who received the instruction in
strategy use improved their performance. Thus across
this age range, poor performance was modifiable by
explicit instruction.
associate age-related performance deficits in
younger children with the use of recall strategies,
and (b) to determine whether children who performed
poorly in the motor skill would benefit from
learning to apply a recall strategy. Two experiments
were conducted. In Experiment 1, younger children (5-
7 years) and older children (8-10 years) were asked
to recall selected pedaling cadences. Strategy was
assessed by questioning the children immediately
following the recall. In this experiment the
majority of the older children used strategies,
while the younger children did not. Children who
used strategies performed with less error than the
children who did not. In Experiment 2 then, children
with high errors in Experiment 1 were assigned to an
experimental or a control group. The children in the
experimental group were taught to use a specific
strategy to assist their recall. The results showed
that children who received the instruction in
strategy use improved their performance. Thus across
this age range, poor performance was modifiable by
explicit instruction.