This study examines the role of air support in defending expeditionary air bases on the nonlinear battlefield. The study begins by calling on US Army doctrine to describe the characteristics of the nonlinear battlefield. Emphasis is placed on the undefended seams that emerge on this battlefield, noting that these seams can be exploited by enemy forces to move within striking distance of expeditionary air bases. Next, the study outlines the various reasons why expeditionary air bases make such an attractive target for ground attack: the extreme difficulty of fighting the US Air Force in symmetric aerial combat; the inherent vulnerability of expeditionary operations; the fragility of modern aircraft to ground attack; and the potential payoff of successful attacks. To determine the methods adversaries may use to attack air bases in the future, the study then briefly surveys the history of ground attacks against air bases in three conflicts: British raids against Axis airfields in World War II; Viet Cong and North Vietnamese Army attacks against US air bases in Vietnam; and Mujahideen missile attacks against aircraft landing and taking off from air bases in Afghanistan from 19861988. This review strongly suggests that the most dangerous and likely threat to air bases is posed by standoff weapons. The study assesses that this threat is particularly hard to counter due to recent advances in standoff weaponry and the difficulty involved in controlling the "standoff footprint."
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.