Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Dealing with Dysfunction]( "Dealing with Dysfunction")
Dealing with Dysfunction37,99 €![Exploring the Use of Computational Cognitive Models to Personalize Training]( "Exploring the Use of Computational Cognitive Models to Personalize Training")
Exploring the Use of Computational Cognitive Models to Personalize Training35,99 €![Creating Readiness Metrics for the Army Civilian Workforce]( "Creating Readiness Metrics for the Army Civilian Workforce")
Creating Readiness Metrics for the Army Civilian Workforce32,99 €![USCG Project Evergreen V]( "USCG Project Evergreen V")
USCG Project Evergreen V58,99 €![Addressing the Friction Between the Army's People First Initiatives and Its Readiness Generation Process]( "Addressing the Friction Between the Army's People First Initiatives and Its Readiness Generation Process")
Addressing the Friction Between the Army's People First Initiatives and Its Readiness Generation Process38,99 €![Modernizing the Federal Government: Paying for Performance]( "Modernizing the Federal Government: Paying for Performance")
Modernizing the Federal Government: Paying for Performance19,99 €![Preparing and Training for the Full Spectrum of Military Challenges]( "Preparing and Training for the Full Spectrum of Military Challenges")
Preparing and Training for the Full Spectrum of Military Challenges42,99 €
Senior Department of the Air Force leadership is increasingly concerned that the current readiness assessment system is not providing sufficient insight into the capability of the force to meet future mission requirements because of the shortcomings of outcome measurements. Concurrently, the U.S. Air Force is evolving its training infrastructure in response to the prospect of operations in contested and denied environments, an increased pace of warfare, and the potential loss of superiority across multiple domains in a conflict with near-peer adversaries. Advances in the technological capabilities of training infrastructure can help fill gaps in current readiness assessments to provide senior leaders with better insight into the readiness of the force for future contingencies. To understand how such investments might do so, the authors used a multimethod approach that featured interviews with senior leaders in Air Force major commands and technical experts and included reviews of readiness reporting data and technical documentation. The report identifies current readiness assessment gaps and explores ways to address them through investments in training assets. One finding was that legacy metrics tend to focus on individual units, but the force must be able to integrate well to conduct the full spectrum of possible operations against a near-peer adversary. This requires adjusting training and how readiness is measured to assess how personnel from different units function as teams at various levels.
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.