The procedure of constitutional interpretation govern as to how, and where constitutional complaint presented; and how determined and finally enforced by the concerned official. In a nutshell, one may comfortably conclude that procedural rules, in essence, give effect ("life") to the ends sought to be achieved by the constitution. However, the relevance of the constitutional complaint procedure is not yet familiar practice in Ethiopia. Nor is the distinction between objective and subjective purposes of the constitutional complaint well understood. These and other related problems attract my attention to write on this particular area. This work is written more of not in attempt to discuss constitutional interpretation and which organ is empowered to adjudicate constitutional complaint.