Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![A Multi-Objective Decision-Making Model for Resources Allocation in Humanitarian Relief]( "A Multi-Objective Decision-Making Model for Resources Allocation in Humanitarian Relief")
A Multi-Objective Decision-Making Model for Resources Allocation in Humanitarian Relief64,99 €![Coverage of Continuous Regions in Euclidean Space Using Homogeneous Resources with Application to the Allocation of Phased Array Radar Systems]( "Coverage of Continuous Regions in Euclidean Space Using Homogeneous Resources with Application to the Allocation of Phased Array Radar Systems")
Coverage of Continuous Regions in Euclidean Space Using Homogeneous Resources with Application to the Allocation of Phased Array Radar Systems63,99 €![A Matter of Trust: Close Air Support Apportionment and Allocation for Operational Level Effects]( "A Matter of Trust: Close Air Support Apportionment and Allocation for Operational Level Effects")
A Matter of Trust: Close Air Support Apportionment and Allocation for Operational Level Effects64,99 €![Structure: Suitable Staffing and Training of Functional Specialists within the United States Army Reserve Civil Affairs Force]( "Structure: Suitable Staffing and Training of Functional Specialists within the United States Army Reserve Civil Affairs Force")
Structure: Suitable Staffing and Training of Functional Specialists within the United States Army Reserve Civil Affairs Force63,99 €![Allocation of Units Within a Typical Field Army]( "Allocation of Units Within a Typical Field Army")
Allocation of Units Within a Typical Field Army63,99 €![An Evaluation of the Suitability of Air Force Operations and Maintenance Funding For Use in a Nomothetic Model]( "An Evaluation of the Suitability of Air Force Operations and Maintenance Funding For Use in a Nomothetic Model")
An Evaluation of the Suitability of Air Force Operations and Maintenance Funding For Use in a Nomothetic Model63,99 €![Army Reserve Component Restructure: Does the Canadian Model Have Validity for US Army Reserve Components?]( "Army Reserve Component Restructure: Does the Canadian Model Have Validity for US Army Reserve Components?")
Army Reserve Component Restructure: Does the Canadian Model Have Validity for US Army Reserve Components?64,99 €
The United States Army Reserve (USAR) apportions approximately 37 percent of the end strength of the total Army to fill the mission requirements necessary of the go to war Army. However, the total funding outlay provided to the Army Reserve MILCON program is a funded number not to exceed $70 million per annum, which is significantly less then the $10 billion given to the Active Component for support to the, United States Army Corps of Engineers for MILCON. With the new Army "vision" and a need for a streamlined force tailored for both the regional conflict and in support of our war on terrorism. The Active Army force structure is likely to be reduced in size with a similar number of combat support and combat service support personnel shifting to the Reserve Components. Given this proportional shift in end strength, the USAR should be provided with a plus up in MILCON funding. Identifying the process, requirements and funding methodology currently utilized is the primary analysis utilized within this thesis and provides the justification for validation of USAR project requirements. The Active Army MILCON requirements alone seemingly outweigh the needs of the USAR force regardless, and investigation is aimed to point facts at this un-proportionality. This downward spiral is illogical given the current force structure and lobbying efforts ongoing within the active and reserve forces.
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.