Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Acting under the "e;Guise of the Good"e;. A critical analysis of the evaluation requirement for intentional agency]( "Acting under the "e;Guise of the Good"e;. A critical analysis of the evaluation requirement for intentional agency")
Acting under the "e;Guise of the Good"e;. A critical analysis of the evaluation requirement for intentional agency15,95 €![In the Realm of Legal and Moral Philosophy]( "In the Realm of Legal and Moral Philosophy")
In the Realm of Legal and Moral Philosophy74,99 €![The Ethics of Animal Re-Creation and Modification]( "The Ethics of Animal Re-Creation and Modification")
The Ethics of Animal Re-Creation and Modification37,99 €![Moral Theory and Legal Reasoning]( "Moral Theory and Legal Reasoning")
Moral Theory and Legal Reasoning241,99 €![Creativity - the vector of scientific search]( "Creativity - the vector of scientific search")
Creativity - the vector of scientific search26,99 €![Thinking the Creation of Thought]( "Thinking the Creation of Thought")
Thinking the Creation of Thought26,99 €![The Legal Position of War: Changes in its Practice and Theory from Plato to Vattel]( "The Legal Position of War: Changes in its Practice and Theory from Plato to Vattel")
The Legal Position of War: Changes in its Practice and Theory from Plato to Vattel39,99 €
![Acting under the "e;Guise of the Good"e;. A critical analysis of the evaluation requirement for intentional agency](https://bilder.buecher.de/produkte/56/56844/56844501n.jpg "Acting under the "e;Guise of the Good"e;. A critical analysis of the evaluation requirement for intentional agency")
Essay from the year 2020 in the subject Philosophy - Practical (Ethics, Aesthetics, Culture, Nature, Right, ...), University of Manchester, language: English, abstract: This essay will evaluate the moral principles which are engaged in the creation of compatible sibling donors specifically for providing treatment to existing children. I will explain why using reproductive technology as a means to this end has no ethical standing. In order to achieve this, I will use deontological moral theories to defend the medico-legal principle of personal autonomy, and to rebut that of procreative autonomy. Compatible sibling donors, hereafter noted as 'saviour siblings', not only lack legal definition, but also cause a deep divide between members of Parliament and the Courts.This is because the concept of them causes a struggle between two substantial principles: procreative autonomy and personal autonomy. I will argue throughout this essay that while there is no doubt that the creation of saviour siblings can bring about a positive end result by helping existing sick children, this utilitarian argument cannot trump the serious ethical issues which simultaneously arise.