Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Africa's Economic Integration and Trade Defence Instruments]( "Africa's Economic Integration and Trade Defence Instruments")
Africa's Economic Integration and Trade Defence Instruments67,99 €![Patterns of Treaty Interpretation as Anti-Fragmentation Tools]( "Patterns of Treaty Interpretation as Anti-Fragmentation Tools")
Patterns of Treaty Interpretation as Anti-Fragmentation Tools117,99 €![Decommissioning Of Offshore Installations In Selected Jurisdictions]( "Decommissioning Of Offshore Installations In Selected Jurisdictions")
Decommissioning Of Offshore Installations In Selected Jurisdictions26,99 €![Trade Remedies in Regional Trade Agreements]( "Trade Remedies in Regional Trade Agreements")
Trade Remedies in Regional Trade Agreements26,99 €![Monetary compensation as a remedy in the WTO dispute settlement system]( "Monetary compensation as a remedy in the WTO dispute settlement system")
Monetary compensation as a remedy in the WTO dispute settlement system32,99 €![Opening Markets for Foreign Skills: How Can the WTO Help?]( "Opening Markets for Foreign Skills: How Can the WTO Help?")
Opening Markets for Foreign Skills: How Can the WTO Help?74,99 €![The Impact of the Ethiopian Anti-terrorism Law on Fundamental Rights]( "The Impact of the Ethiopian Anti-terrorism Law on Fundamental Rights")
The Impact of the Ethiopian Anti-terrorism Law on Fundamental Rights36,99 €
Anti-dumping practice is viewed by many economists as a protectionist s choice tool: A non-tariff barrier responsible for distortion of free flow of trade. Since the raison d être of the WTO is to reduce (and if possible eliminate) barriers to free flow of trade, the existence of anti-dumping laws in GATT/WTO alongside trade liberalisation provisions have continued to generate considerable controversy. This work appraises the conceptual foundation of US anti-dumping law and its influence on GATT/WTO anti-dumping practice. It also examines the circumstances surrounding the inclusion of Article 17 in the Anti-dumping Agreement as a special US contribution to WTO anti-dumping practice. Ultimately, this inquiry identifies that the US maintains a crucial position in shaping outcomes in anti-dumping disciplines in the WTO. It makes the case that such role can only be appropriately undertaken by the US itself readjusting its guiding paradigm on anti-dumping practice.