Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Process and Procedure: The Tactical Decision Making Process and Decision Point Tactics]( "Process and Procedure: The Tactical Decision Making Process and Decision Point Tactics")
Process and Procedure: The Tactical Decision Making Process and Decision Point Tactics61,99 €![Sense of Locality and Tactical Agility]( "Sense of Locality and Tactical Agility")
Sense of Locality and Tactical Agility60,99 €![Between Discipline and Intuition: The Military Decision Making Process in the Army's Future Force]( "Between Discipline and Intuition: The Military Decision Making Process in the Army's Future Force")
Between Discipline and Intuition: The Military Decision Making Process in the Army's Future Force61,99 €![Parallel Attack and the Enemy's Decision Making Process]( "Parallel Attack and the Enemy's Decision Making Process")
Parallel Attack and the Enemy's Decision Making Process60,99 €![Applicability of the Military Decision-Making Process in the Air Operations Center]( "Applicability of the Military Decision-Making Process in the Air Operations Center")
Applicability of the Military Decision-Making Process in the Air Operations Center60,99 €![The Deliberate Decision Making Process Toolbook]( "The Deliberate Decision Making Process Toolbook")
The Deliberate Decision Making Process Toolbook60,99 €![Policy Decision Process of the Islamic Republic of Iran: Through a Glass Darkly]( "Policy Decision Process of the Islamic Republic of Iran: Through a Glass Darkly")
Policy Decision Process of the Islamic Republic of Iran: Through a Glass Darkly60,99 €
This monograph discusses the components and characteristics of decision-making that are necessary to achieve the tactical agility required in AirLand Battle. As one of the four tenets of AirLine Doctrine, agility - the ability to decide and act faster than the enemy - is fundamental to AirLand Battle's approach to generating and applying combat power. It is a prerequisite for seizing, maintaining and exploiting the initiative. The study is based on the premise that it is the relative effect of combat power compared to that of the enemy which determines the outcomes of engagements and battles. It proceeds with a theoretical inquiry into the nature of agility as it relates to combat power, the environment of battle, and the decision-making process. Next it examines these relationships in the context of two historical examples: Balck's counterattack along the Chir River in December of 1942, and Wood's exploitation in the Nancy Bridgehead in September of 1944. Based on this theoretical and historical analysis, the study then presents a conceptual model of an 'agile decision-making process.' This conceptual model suggests how the basic decision-making process - a feedback control mechanism - can be adapted to the uncertain, unpredictable and constantly changing battlefield to achieve a relative combat power advantage through tactical agility. It considers how such an adapted process can deal with the inherent elements of risk and unstable probabilities on the battlefield to generate further opportunities for exploitation. In considering such a process, this discussion also identifies specific characteristics required in both the decision-making organization and, the leaders who make decisions, and those who execute them. Together, they represent a system of battle designed to meet the tactical agility requirements of AirLand Battle.