Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![The Popular Anti-Icon in American Sports]( "The Popular Anti-Icon in American Sports")
The Popular Anti-Icon in American Sports99,10 €![Atheism and Theism in Contemporary Fantasy Fiction]( "Atheism and Theism in Contemporary Fantasy Fiction")
Atheism and Theism in Contemporary Fantasy Fiction69,95 €![American Patriotism and Corporate Identity in Automobile Advertising]( "American Patriotism and Corporate Identity in Automobile Advertising")
American Patriotism and Corporate Identity in Automobile Advertising84,65 €![Motherhood and Self-Realization in the Four Waves of American Feminism and Joyce Carol Oates's Recent Fiction]( "Motherhood and Self-Realization in the Four Waves of American Feminism and Joyce Carol Oates's Recent Fiction")
Motherhood and Self-Realization in the Four Waves of American Feminism and Joyce Carol Oates's Recent Fiction98,25 €![Salem ¿ A Literary Profile]( "Salem ¿ A Literary Profile")
Salem ¿ A Literary Profile77,85 €![Modern and Postmodern Narratives of Race, Gender, and Identity]( "Modern and Postmodern Narratives of Race, Gender, and Identity")
Modern and Postmodern Narratives of Race, Gender, and Identity104,20 €![The Exercise of Soft Power ¿ U.S. Self-Imaging in International Broadcasting to Iran]( "The Exercise of Soft Power ¿ U.S. Self-Imaging in International Broadcasting to Iran")
The Exercise of Soft Power ¿ U.S. Self-Imaging in International Broadcasting to Iran67,75 €
This study counters the view that Franklin D. Roosevelt hegemonically exalted Thomas Jefferson to iconic dominance during the Great Depression. It analyzes the diversity of those who appropriated Jefferson to find answers to the socio-economic crisis and modern industrial capitalism. This discourse analysis, spanning the ideological spectrum between 1929-1945, reveals that the creation of the Jefferson icon-in various forms of representation-generated counterhegemonic varieties of Jefferson because the appropriators grafted their values onto the historical figure which led to its transformation. These competing versions of Jefferson expressed a reformed sense of national values not only through commonalities but through the flexibility of interpretative and representational differences.