Table of contents:
- Contributors
- Preface
- Part One: Re-Modelling Logic
- Introduction
- A Necessary Component of Logic
- 1. Logic has empirical components and needs empirical research
- 2. 6;Argumentation analysis'
- 3. Options in a clarification and assessment game
- 4. Analysis of agreement and pseudo-agreement
- 5. Degree of definiteness of intention (discrimination acuity) as a factor in argumentation
- 6. The hermeneutical spiral as a factor in argumentation
- Die Dialogische Begründung Von Logikkalkülen
- 1. Drei Typen von Logikkalkülen
- 2. Das Begründungsproblem
- 3. Empraktische Einführung der Verwendungsregeln
- 4. Materiale Dialoge
- 5. Erweiterungen der strengen Dialoge
- 6. Die effektive Dialogregel
- 7. Das Problem der Konsistenz
- 8. Die klassische Dialogregel
- 9. Die Beziehung materialer Dialoge zu Logikkalkülen
- 10. Zur Frage der sog
- 11. Vollständigkeit ohne Semantik
- Sherlock Holmes Confronts Modern Logic
- 1. Sherlock Holmes vs. philosophers on deduction
- 2. Making tacit information explicit through questioning
- 3. The structure of question-inference complexes
- 4. On the principle of total evidence. Bayesianism
- 5. The role of observations
- 6. Question-answer sequences as games against Nature
- 7. Payoffs and strategies
- 8. Deductions sometimes replaceable by questions and answers
- Semantical Games and Transcendental Arguments
- 1. Kant on the logic of existence
- 2. Seeking and finding, and game-theoretical semantics
- 3. A transcendental refutation of certain related views
- 4. A test-case
- 5. Material vs. logical truth, formal argumentation, and semantics
- 6. From semantical games to dialogical ones
- Towards a General Theory of Argumentation
- 1. Logic and rhetorics, heuristics, proof theory
- 2. Theory of discussion
- 3. What are discussions?
- 4. Reduction to the theory of (inter-)action
- 5. 'Proponent', 'Opponent', 'defence' and 'attack'
- 6. Systematic connections between the theory of games and some theories discussed at this conference
- 7. Hamblin's theory
- 8. Decomposition of argumentative texts
- 9. Equivocation and use of metaphors
- Theory of Argumentation and the Dialectical Garb of Formal Logic
- Ein Konstruktiver Weg Zur Semantik Der 'Möglichen Welten'
- 1. Dialogebenen
- 2. Beispiele
- 3. Beziehung zu den modallogischen Standardsystemen
- Part Two: Choosing the Rules
- Introduction
- On the Criteria for the Choice of Rules of Dialogic Logic
- 1. A game-theoretic pragmatic conception of truth
- 2. Specifying the game ('global' game rules)
- 3. Argument rules ('local' game rules)
- 4. Subjunction
- 5. Formal winning-strategy and formal truth
- 6. A theorem of formal dialogic logic
- A Normative-Pragmatical Foundation of the Rules of some Systems of Formal3 Dialectics
- 1. New foundations
- 2. Two purposes 2; presentation of the dialectical systems, and the problem of fallacy
- 3. Basic norms and ends; implementations
- 4. Dialectics should be systematic and thorough going
- 5. Dialectics should be orderly and dynamic
- 6. Epilogue
- Part Three: Describing Argumentative Dialogues
- Introduction
- A Set of Concepts for the Study of Dialogical Argumentation
- 1. Introduction
- 2. Argumentation 2; informally described
- 3. Dialogue bases
- 4. Co-operative argumentative dialogues and argumentation
- Montague-Grammars for Argumentative Dialogues
- 2. Background and motivation
- 3. An example of a dialogue
- 4. A Montague-grammar
- Part Four: Analysing Philosophy
- Introduction
- Formal Dialectics as Immanent Criticism of Philosophical Systems
- 2. The provocative thesis
- 3. Critical interpretation of the logical constants
- 4. Information-seeking interpretation of the logical constants
- An Application of Empirical Argumentation Analysis to Spinoza's 'Ethics'
- 1. The propositions of the 'Ethics' conceived of as arguments in a debate
- 2. Spinoza's theses of equivalence
- 3. Equivalences as arguments
- Finite Debates About 'The Infinite'
- 1. Two philosophical paradigms
- 2. 'Tongue-twisting for the sake of consistency' 2; a recent description of the Weierstrass method
- 3. Two-role logic and the notion of 6;limit'
- 4. Instantaneous velocities
- 5. Paradigmatically misleading expressions
- 6. Conclusion
- Part Five: Analysing Interaction
- Introduction
- A Decision-Theoretical Interpretation of Dialogues
- On the Philosophy of Argument and the Logic of Common Morality
- 1. Dialectical argument and first principles
- 2. The fundamental principle of morality
- 3. A dialogical approach to the logic of common morality
- Theory of Argumentation
- A. Chronological Bibliography
- B. Index of Names to Chronological Bibliography
- Contributors
- Preface
- Part One: Re-Modelling Logic
- Introduction
- A Necessary Component of Logic
- 1. Logic has empirical components and needs empirical research
- 2. 6;Argumentation analysis'
- 3. Options in a clarification and assessment game
- 4. Analysis of agreement and pseudo-agreement
- 5. Degree of definiteness of intention (discrimination acuity) as a factor in argumentation
- 6. The hermeneutical spiral as a factor in argumentation
- Die Dialogische Begründung Von Logikkalkülen
- 1. Drei Typen von Logikkalkülen
- 2. Das Begründungsproblem
- 3. Empraktische Einführung der Verwendungsregeln
- 4. Materiale Dialoge
- 5. Erweiterungen der strengen Dialoge
- 6. Die effektive Dialogregel
- 7. Das Problem der Konsistenz
- 8. Die klassische Dialogregel
- 9. Die Beziehung materialer Dialoge zu Logikkalkülen
- 10. Zur Frage der sog
- 11. Vollständigkeit ohne Semantik
- Sherlock Holmes Confronts Modern Logic
- 1. Sherlock Holmes vs. philosophers on deduction
- 2. Making tacit information explicit through questioning
- 3. The structure of question-inference complexes
- 4. On the principle of total evidence. Bayesianism
- 5. The role of observations
- 6. Question-answer sequences as games against Nature
- 7. Payoffs and strategies
- 8. Deductions sometimes replaceable by questions and answers
- Semantical Games and Transcendental Arguments
- 1. Kant on the logic of existence
- 2. Seeking and finding, and game-theoretical semantics
- 3. A transcendental refutation of certain related views
- 4. A test-case
- 5. Material vs. logical truth, formal argumentation, and semantics
- 6. From semantical games to dialogical ones
- Towards a General Theory of Argumentation
- 1. Logic and rhetorics, heuristics, proof theory
- 2. Theory of discussion
- 3. What are discussions?
- 4. Reduction to the theory of (inter-)action
- 5. 'Proponent', 'Opponent', 'defence' and 'attack'
- 6. Systematic connections between the theory of games and some theories discussed at this conference
- 7. Hamblin's theory
- 8. Decomposition of argumentative texts
- 9. Equivocation and use of metaphors
- Theory of Argumentation and the Dialectical Garb of Formal Logic
- Ein Konstruktiver Weg Zur Semantik Der 'Möglichen Welten'
- 1. Dialogebenen
- 2. Beispiele
- 3. Beziehung zu den modallogischen Standardsystemen
- Part Two: Choosing the Rules
- Introduction
- On the Criteria for the Choice of Rules of Dialogic Logic
- 1. A game-theoretic pragmatic conception of truth
- 2. Specifying the game ('global' game rules)
- 3. Argument rules ('local' game rules)
- 4. Subjunction
- 5. Formal winning-strategy and formal truth
- 6. A theorem of formal dialogic logic
- A Normative-Pragmatical Foundation of the Rules of some Systems of Formal3 Dialectics
- 1. New foundations
- 2. Two purposes 2; presentation of the dialectical systems, and the problem of fallacy
- 3. Basic norms and ends; implementations
- 4. Dialectics should be systematic and thorough going
- 5. Dialectics should be orderly and dynamic
- 6. Epilogue
- Part Three: Describing Argumentative Dialogues
- Introduction
- A Set of Concepts for the Study of Dialogical Argumentation
- 1. Introduction
- 2. Argumentation 2; informally described
- 3. Dialogue bases
- 4. Co-operative argumentative dialogues and argumentation
- Montague-Grammars for Argumentative Dialogues
- 2. Background and motivation
- 3. An example of a dialogue
- 4. A Montague-grammar
- Part Four: Analysing Philosophy
- Introduction
- Formal Dialectics as Immanent Criticism of Philosophical Systems
- 2. The provocative thesis
- 3. Critical interpretation of the logical constants
- 4. Information-seeking interpretation of the logical constants
- An Application of Empirical Argumentation Analysis to Spinoza's 'Ethics'
- 1. The propositions of the 'Ethics' conceived of as arguments in a debate
- 2. Spinoza's theses of equivalence
- 3. Equivalences as arguments
- Finite Debates About 'The Infinite'
- 1. Two philosophical paradigms
- 2. 'Tongue-twisting for the sake of consistency' 2; a recent description of the Weierstrass method
- 3. Two-role logic and the notion of 6;limit'
- 4. Instantaneous velocities
- 5. Paradigmatically misleading expressions
- 6. Conclusion
- Part Five: Analysing Interaction
- Introduction
- A Decision-Theoretical Interpretation of Dialogues
- On the Philosophy of Argument and the Logic of Common Morality
- 1. Dialectical argument and first principles
- 2. The fundamental principle of morality
- 3. A dialogical approach to the logic of common morality
- Theory of Argumentation
- A. Chronological Bibliography
- B. Index of Names to Chronological Bibliography