Matthew W. McKeon (Associate Pro Associate Professor of Philosophy
Arguments and Reason-Giving
Matthew W. McKeon (Associate Pro Associate Professor of Philosophy
Arguments and Reason-Giving
- Gebundenes Buch
- Merkliste
- Auf die Merkliste
- Bewerten Bewerten
- Teilen
- Produkt teilen
- Produkterinnerung
- Produkterinnerung
Arguments figure in our everyday practices of giving reasons. For example, we use arguments to advance reasons to explain why we believe or did something, to justify our beliefs or actions, to persuade others to do or to believe something, and to advance reasons to worry or to fear that something is true. This book is about our uses of arguments to advance their premises as reasons for believing their conclusions, i.e., as reasons for believing that their conclusions are true. What, exactly, is involved when you successfully use an argument to advance the premises as reasons for believing the…mehr
Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
- Ali AlmossawiAn Illustrated Book of Bad Arguments15,73 €
- Bad Arguments20,99 €
- Ulf HlobilReasons for Logic, Logic for Reasons84,99 €
- Harold Noonan (UK University of Nottingham)Routledge Philosophy GuideBook to Kripke and Naming and Necessity40,99 €
- Annamaria SchiaparelliAristotle: Topics Book VI132,99 €
- A. J. CotnoirMereology148,99 €
- Annamaria SchiaparelliAristotle: Topics Book VI41,99 €
-
-
-
Arguments figure in our everyday practices of giving reasons. For example, we use arguments to advance reasons to explain why we believe or did something, to justify our beliefs or actions, to persuade others to do or to believe something, and to advance reasons to worry or to fear that something is true. This book is about our uses of arguments to advance their premises as reasons for believing their conclusions, i.e., as reasons for believing that their conclusions are true. What, exactly, is involved when you successfully use an argument to advance the premises as reasons for believing the conclusion? Philosopher Matthew W. McKeon suggests there is more involved than one might think.
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.
Produktdetails
- Produktdetails
- Verlag: Oxford University Press Inc
- Seitenzahl: 368
- Erscheinungstermin: 21. Mai 2024
- Englisch
- Abmessung: 224mm x 152mm x 33mm
- Gewicht: 664g
- ISBN-13: 9780197751633
- ISBN-10: 0197751636
- Artikelnr.: 69823653
- Verlag: Oxford University Press Inc
- Seitenzahl: 368
- Erscheinungstermin: 21. Mai 2024
- Englisch
- Abmessung: 224mm x 152mm x 33mm
- Gewicht: 664g
- ISBN-13: 9780197751633
- ISBN-10: 0197751636
- Artikelnr.: 69823653
Matthew W. McKeon is Associate Professor of Philosophy at Michigan State University where he has been Chair of the Department of Philosophy since 2011.
* Chapter 1: Introduction
* Part I: Arguments, Inference Claims, and Reflective Inference
* Chapter 2: Reason-Giving Uses of Arguments
* 2.1 Preamble
* 2.2 Arguing and arguments
* 2.3 Arguments in informal logic, argumentation studies, and formal
logic
* 2.3.1 Arguments in informal logic
* 2.3.2 Argumentation studies
* 2.3.3 Arguments in formal logic
* 2.4 Reason-giving uses of arguments
* 2.5 Conclusion
* Chapter 3: Inference Claims
* 3.1 Preamble
* 3.2 Argument claims and uses of arguments
* 3.3 The connection between inference claims and reason-giving uses of
argument
* 3.3.1 Inference claim and reasons for believing
* 3.3.2 Dialectical arguments and reason-giving uses of arguments
* 3.4 How, exactly, are inference claims conveyed by one's statement of
an argument?
* 3.4.1 Mere implication
* 3.4.2 Conversational implicature
* 3.4.3 Conventional implicature
* 3.4.4 Assertion
* 3.5 Conclusion
* Chapter 4: Reflective Inference
* 4.1 Preamble
* 4.2 Critical Thinking
* 4.2.1 Baseline characterizations of critical thinking
* 4.2.2 Inference and critical thinking
* 4.3 Reflective inferences and reason-giving uses of arguments
* 4.4 Conclusion
* Part II: Formal Validity, Rational Persuasion, Argumentative
Rationality, Intellectual Honest and Intellectual Integrity
* Chapter 5: Reason-Giving Uses of Arguments, Formally Valid Arguments,
and Demonstrative Arguments
* 5.1 Preamble
* 5.2 Deductive arguments, demonstrative arguments, and reflective
inferences
* 5.3 Formally valid arguments and demonstrative arguments
* 5.4 Formally valid arguments and reason-giving uses of arguments
* 5.5 Demonstrative arguments and reason-giving uses of arguments
* 5.6 Conclusion
* Chapter 6: Reason-Giving Uses of Argument, Invitations to Inference,
and Rational Persuasion
* 6.1 Preamble
* 6.2 Invitations to inference are reason-giving uses of arguments
* 6.3 Invitations to inference invite only the inferences expressed by
the arguments used
* 6.4 Indirect persuasion
* 6.5 Conclusion
* Chapter 7: Reason-Giving Uses of Arguments and Argumentative
Rationality
* 7.1 Preamble
* 7.2 Reason for belief and the rationality of belief
* 7.3 The Pragma-epistemic approach to argumentative rationality
* 7.4. The epistemic and pragma-dialectic approaches to argumentative
rationality
* 7.4.1 The objective epistemic approach to argumentative rationality
* 7.4.2 The Pragma-dialectic approach to argumentative rationality
* 7.5 Argumentative rationality and good argumentation
* 7.6 Conclusion
* Chapter 8: Reason-Giving Uses of Arguments, Intellectual Honesty, and
Intellectual integrity
* 8.1 Preamble
* 8.2 Intellectual honesty and truthfulness
* 8.3 Reason-giving uses of arguments and intellectual honesty
* 8.4 Reason-giving uses of arguments and intellectual integrity
* 8.5 Conclusion
* Index
* Part I: Arguments, Inference Claims, and Reflective Inference
* Chapter 2: Reason-Giving Uses of Arguments
* 2.1 Preamble
* 2.2 Arguing and arguments
* 2.3 Arguments in informal logic, argumentation studies, and formal
logic
* 2.3.1 Arguments in informal logic
* 2.3.2 Argumentation studies
* 2.3.3 Arguments in formal logic
* 2.4 Reason-giving uses of arguments
* 2.5 Conclusion
* Chapter 3: Inference Claims
* 3.1 Preamble
* 3.2 Argument claims and uses of arguments
* 3.3 The connection between inference claims and reason-giving uses of
argument
* 3.3.1 Inference claim and reasons for believing
* 3.3.2 Dialectical arguments and reason-giving uses of arguments
* 3.4 How, exactly, are inference claims conveyed by one's statement of
an argument?
* 3.4.1 Mere implication
* 3.4.2 Conversational implicature
* 3.4.3 Conventional implicature
* 3.4.4 Assertion
* 3.5 Conclusion
* Chapter 4: Reflective Inference
* 4.1 Preamble
* 4.2 Critical Thinking
* 4.2.1 Baseline characterizations of critical thinking
* 4.2.2 Inference and critical thinking
* 4.3 Reflective inferences and reason-giving uses of arguments
* 4.4 Conclusion
* Part II: Formal Validity, Rational Persuasion, Argumentative
Rationality, Intellectual Honest and Intellectual Integrity
* Chapter 5: Reason-Giving Uses of Arguments, Formally Valid Arguments,
and Demonstrative Arguments
* 5.1 Preamble
* 5.2 Deductive arguments, demonstrative arguments, and reflective
inferences
* 5.3 Formally valid arguments and demonstrative arguments
* 5.4 Formally valid arguments and reason-giving uses of arguments
* 5.5 Demonstrative arguments and reason-giving uses of arguments
* 5.6 Conclusion
* Chapter 6: Reason-Giving Uses of Argument, Invitations to Inference,
and Rational Persuasion
* 6.1 Preamble
* 6.2 Invitations to inference are reason-giving uses of arguments
* 6.3 Invitations to inference invite only the inferences expressed by
the arguments used
* 6.4 Indirect persuasion
* 6.5 Conclusion
* Chapter 7: Reason-Giving Uses of Arguments and Argumentative
Rationality
* 7.1 Preamble
* 7.2 Reason for belief and the rationality of belief
* 7.3 The Pragma-epistemic approach to argumentative rationality
* 7.4. The epistemic and pragma-dialectic approaches to argumentative
rationality
* 7.4.1 The objective epistemic approach to argumentative rationality
* 7.4.2 The Pragma-dialectic approach to argumentative rationality
* 7.5 Argumentative rationality and good argumentation
* 7.6 Conclusion
* Chapter 8: Reason-Giving Uses of Arguments, Intellectual Honesty, and
Intellectual integrity
* 8.1 Preamble
* 8.2 Intellectual honesty and truthfulness
* 8.3 Reason-giving uses of arguments and intellectual honesty
* 8.4 Reason-giving uses of arguments and intellectual integrity
* 8.5 Conclusion
* Index
* Chapter 1: Introduction
* Part I: Arguments, Inference Claims, and Reflective Inference
* Chapter 2: Reason-Giving Uses of Arguments
* 2.1 Preamble
* 2.2 Arguing and arguments
* 2.3 Arguments in informal logic, argumentation studies, and formal
logic
* 2.3.1 Arguments in informal logic
* 2.3.2 Argumentation studies
* 2.3.3 Arguments in formal logic
* 2.4 Reason-giving uses of arguments
* 2.5 Conclusion
* Chapter 3: Inference Claims
* 3.1 Preamble
* 3.2 Argument claims and uses of arguments
* 3.3 The connection between inference claims and reason-giving uses of
argument
* 3.3.1 Inference claim and reasons for believing
* 3.3.2 Dialectical arguments and reason-giving uses of arguments
* 3.4 How, exactly, are inference claims conveyed by one's statement of
an argument?
* 3.4.1 Mere implication
* 3.4.2 Conversational implicature
* 3.4.3 Conventional implicature
* 3.4.4 Assertion
* 3.5 Conclusion
* Chapter 4: Reflective Inference
* 4.1 Preamble
* 4.2 Critical Thinking
* 4.2.1 Baseline characterizations of critical thinking
* 4.2.2 Inference and critical thinking
* 4.3 Reflective inferences and reason-giving uses of arguments
* 4.4 Conclusion
* Part II: Formal Validity, Rational Persuasion, Argumentative
Rationality, Intellectual Honest and Intellectual Integrity
* Chapter 5: Reason-Giving Uses of Arguments, Formally Valid Arguments,
and Demonstrative Arguments
* 5.1 Preamble
* 5.2 Deductive arguments, demonstrative arguments, and reflective
inferences
* 5.3 Formally valid arguments and demonstrative arguments
* 5.4 Formally valid arguments and reason-giving uses of arguments
* 5.5 Demonstrative arguments and reason-giving uses of arguments
* 5.6 Conclusion
* Chapter 6: Reason-Giving Uses of Argument, Invitations to Inference,
and Rational Persuasion
* 6.1 Preamble
* 6.2 Invitations to inference are reason-giving uses of arguments
* 6.3 Invitations to inference invite only the inferences expressed by
the arguments used
* 6.4 Indirect persuasion
* 6.5 Conclusion
* Chapter 7: Reason-Giving Uses of Arguments and Argumentative
Rationality
* 7.1 Preamble
* 7.2 Reason for belief and the rationality of belief
* 7.3 The Pragma-epistemic approach to argumentative rationality
* 7.4. The epistemic and pragma-dialectic approaches to argumentative
rationality
* 7.4.1 The objective epistemic approach to argumentative rationality
* 7.4.2 The Pragma-dialectic approach to argumentative rationality
* 7.5 Argumentative rationality and good argumentation
* 7.6 Conclusion
* Chapter 8: Reason-Giving Uses of Arguments, Intellectual Honesty, and
Intellectual integrity
* 8.1 Preamble
* 8.2 Intellectual honesty and truthfulness
* 8.3 Reason-giving uses of arguments and intellectual honesty
* 8.4 Reason-giving uses of arguments and intellectual integrity
* 8.5 Conclusion
* Index
* Part I: Arguments, Inference Claims, and Reflective Inference
* Chapter 2: Reason-Giving Uses of Arguments
* 2.1 Preamble
* 2.2 Arguing and arguments
* 2.3 Arguments in informal logic, argumentation studies, and formal
logic
* 2.3.1 Arguments in informal logic
* 2.3.2 Argumentation studies
* 2.3.3 Arguments in formal logic
* 2.4 Reason-giving uses of arguments
* 2.5 Conclusion
* Chapter 3: Inference Claims
* 3.1 Preamble
* 3.2 Argument claims and uses of arguments
* 3.3 The connection between inference claims and reason-giving uses of
argument
* 3.3.1 Inference claim and reasons for believing
* 3.3.2 Dialectical arguments and reason-giving uses of arguments
* 3.4 How, exactly, are inference claims conveyed by one's statement of
an argument?
* 3.4.1 Mere implication
* 3.4.2 Conversational implicature
* 3.4.3 Conventional implicature
* 3.4.4 Assertion
* 3.5 Conclusion
* Chapter 4: Reflective Inference
* 4.1 Preamble
* 4.2 Critical Thinking
* 4.2.1 Baseline characterizations of critical thinking
* 4.2.2 Inference and critical thinking
* 4.3 Reflective inferences and reason-giving uses of arguments
* 4.4 Conclusion
* Part II: Formal Validity, Rational Persuasion, Argumentative
Rationality, Intellectual Honest and Intellectual Integrity
* Chapter 5: Reason-Giving Uses of Arguments, Formally Valid Arguments,
and Demonstrative Arguments
* 5.1 Preamble
* 5.2 Deductive arguments, demonstrative arguments, and reflective
inferences
* 5.3 Formally valid arguments and demonstrative arguments
* 5.4 Formally valid arguments and reason-giving uses of arguments
* 5.5 Demonstrative arguments and reason-giving uses of arguments
* 5.6 Conclusion
* Chapter 6: Reason-Giving Uses of Argument, Invitations to Inference,
and Rational Persuasion
* 6.1 Preamble
* 6.2 Invitations to inference are reason-giving uses of arguments
* 6.3 Invitations to inference invite only the inferences expressed by
the arguments used
* 6.4 Indirect persuasion
* 6.5 Conclusion
* Chapter 7: Reason-Giving Uses of Arguments and Argumentative
Rationality
* 7.1 Preamble
* 7.2 Reason for belief and the rationality of belief
* 7.3 The Pragma-epistemic approach to argumentative rationality
* 7.4. The epistemic and pragma-dialectic approaches to argumentative
rationality
* 7.4.1 The objective epistemic approach to argumentative rationality
* 7.4.2 The Pragma-dialectic approach to argumentative rationality
* 7.5 Argumentative rationality and good argumentation
* 7.6 Conclusion
* Chapter 8: Reason-Giving Uses of Arguments, Intellectual Honesty, and
Intellectual integrity
* 8.1 Preamble
* 8.2 Intellectual honesty and truthfulness
* 8.3 Reason-giving uses of arguments and intellectual honesty
* 8.4 Reason-giving uses of arguments and intellectual integrity
* 8.5 Conclusion
* Index