Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Aviation in the Support of MOUT]( "Aviation in the Support of MOUT")
Aviation in the Support of MOUT63,99 €![Another Way to Fight: Combat Aviation Advisory Operations]( "Another Way to Fight: Combat Aviation Advisory Operations")
Another Way to Fight: Combat Aviation Advisory Operations63,99 €![Achieving Strategic Effects with Army Attack Aviation]( "Achieving Strategic Effects with Army Attack Aviation")
Achieving Strategic Effects with Army Attack Aviation60,99 €![Optimizing Operational Control of U.S. Army Attack Aviation]( "Optimizing Operational Control of U.S. Army Attack Aviation")
Optimizing Operational Control of U.S. Army Attack Aviation63,99 €![Army Attack Aviation and Joint Air Integration: Doctrinal and Institutional Barriers]( "Army Attack Aviation and Joint Air Integration: Doctrinal and Institutional Barriers")
Army Attack Aviation and Joint Air Integration: Doctrinal and Institutional Barriers60,99 €![Will U.S. Army Attack Aviation Be a Relative Combat Multiplier in Future Conflicts?]( "Will U.S. Army Attack Aviation Be a Relative Combat Multiplier in Future Conflicts?")
Will U.S. Army Attack Aviation Be a Relative Combat Multiplier in Future Conflicts?63,99 €![A Modest Proposal for Air Attack Combat Aviation Advisors]( "A Modest Proposal for Air Attack Combat Aviation Advisors")
A Modest Proposal for Air Attack Combat Aviation Advisors60,99 €
This paper seeks to answer the question of whether or not the modern threat environment should drive U.S. Army Attack Aviation to shift its focus from the deep fight to the close battle. The paper concludes that the modern threat of asymmetric warfare in urban environments should drive training, doctrine, and aircraft and weapons development to optimize readiness for close air support of ground forces in Military Operations on Urban Terrain (MOUT). This conclusion is based an historic review of the evolution of U.S. attack helicopters and their employment, an analysis of the modern threat environment which indicates a strong likelihood of fighting in urban environments, a review of existing aviation doctrine for MOUT, and a review of two recent MOUT case studies, Chechnya and Somalia. These two case studies demonstrate that the most effective method of employing attack helicopters in MOUT is as a fire support element in the close fight. This paper argues in closing that U.S. Army Aviation must move quickly to develop clear and effective doctrine and training methods for employing attack helicopters in the close fight. Furthermore, the U.S. Army must develop future aircraft, weapons systems, and munitions to optimize close air support effectiveness and aircraft survivability.
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.