Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Options for Strengthening All-Source Intelligence]( "Options for Strengthening All-Source Intelligence")
Options for Strengthening All-Source Intelligence21,99 €![Resources Required to Meet the U.S. Army Reserve's Enlisted Recruiting Requirements Under Alternative Recruiting Goals, Conditions, and Eligibility Policies]( "Resources Required to Meet the U.S. Army Reserve's Enlisted Recruiting Requirements Under Alternative Recruiting Goals, Conditions, and Eligibility Policies")
Resources Required to Meet the U.S. Army Reserve's Enlisted Recruiting Requirements Under Alternative Recruiting Goals, Conditions, and Eligibility Policies25,99 €![Options for Strengthening Rok Nuclear Assurance]( "Options for Strengthening Rok Nuclear Assurance")
Options for Strengthening Rok Nuclear Assurance31,99 €![Forecasting End Strength in the U.S. Army Reserve]( "Forecasting End Strength in the U.S. Army Reserve")
Forecasting End Strength in the U.S. Army Reserve32,99 €![Analysis of Alternative Approaches to Measuring Multinational Interoperability]( "Analysis of Alternative Approaches to Measuring Multinational Interoperability")
Analysis of Alternative Approaches to Measuring Multinational Interoperability18,99 €![America's Security Deficit]( "America's Security Deficit")
America's Security Deficit12,99 €![Planning Ethical Influence Operations]( "Planning Ethical Influence Operations")
Planning Ethical Influence Operations28,99 €
The authors developed an Army Enlistment Options Optimizer approach that creates bundles of bonus and non-bonus enlistment incentives, often paired with smaller, supplemental bonuses. If implemented, potential recruits would choose the bundle they most value from those available according to job type, term length, recruit characteristics, and recruiting environment. This gives recruits greater agency in choosing their enlistment options, potentially increasing satisfaction and enlistments. At the same time, the recruit cohorts would have the characteristics desired by the Army and the Army would benefit from cost savings resulting from reduced bonus expenditures. Through two surveys of young adults ages 18-27, the authors found that non-bonus incentives were as attractive as bonuses of $10,000-$15,000. Options that included non-bonus incentives and supplemental bonuses were chosen more often than larger stand-alone bonus options. Respondents choosing those options rated their likelihood of joining the Army in the next few years to be as high as or higher than respondents choosing stand-alone bonuses. The results also indicate that the student loan repayment option is very popular among today's young adults. It could be used to help penetrate the college market and could save recruiting resources when used in a controlled fashion as an element of the option menus. The results suggest that providing information in the recruiting marketing process on the many jobs that the Army offers and the pay and benefits of serving could increase consideration of joining the Army.
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.