Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Operations Tempo and Turnover Intentions: An Exploratory Study of the Air Force's Explosive Ordnance Disposal Career Field and Development of the Air]( "Operations Tempo and Turnover Intentions: An Exploratory Study of the Air Force's Explosive Ordnance Disposal Career Field and Development of the Air")
Operations Tempo and Turnover Intentions: An Exploratory Study of the Air Force's Explosive Ordnance Disposal Career Field and Development of the Air60,99 €![Army Explosive Ordnance Disposal and Army Transformation: Is Army Explosive Ordnance Disposal Prepared to Support Forces in the Emerging Environment?]( "Army Explosive Ordnance Disposal and Army Transformation: Is Army Explosive Ordnance Disposal Prepared to Support Forces in the Emerging Environment?")
Army Explosive Ordnance Disposal and Army Transformation: Is Army Explosive Ordnance Disposal Prepared to Support Forces in the Emerging Environment?60,99 €![Organizational Implications of the U.S. Army's Increasing Demand for Explosive Ordnance Disposal Capabilities]( "Organizational Implications of the U.S. Army's Increasing Demand for Explosive Ordnance Disposal Capabilities")
Organizational Implications of the U.S. Army's Increasing Demand for Explosive Ordnance Disposal Capabilities60,99 €![Implementing Network-Centric Operations in Joint Task Forces: Changes in Joint Doctrine]( "Implementing Network-Centric Operations in Joint Task Forces: Changes in Joint Doctrine")
Implementing Network-Centric Operations in Joint Task Forces: Changes in Joint Doctrine60,99 €![Transformation of Polish Air Forces: What Is Required to Meet NATO Obligations]( "Transformation of Polish Air Forces: What Is Required to Meet NATO Obligations")
Transformation of Polish Air Forces: What Is Required to Meet NATO Obligations60,99 €![Special Operations and Conventional Forces: How to Improve Unity of Effort using Afghanistan as a Case Study]( "Special Operations and Conventional Forces: How to Improve Unity of Effort using Afghanistan as a Case Study")
Special Operations and Conventional Forces: How to Improve Unity of Effort using Afghanistan as a Case Study60,99 €![U.S. Army Apache Helicopters and U.S. Air Force Expeditionary Forces: Implications for Future Military Operations]( "U.S. Army Apache Helicopters and U.S. Air Force Expeditionary Forces: Implications for Future Military Operations")
U.S. Army Apache Helicopters and U.S. Air Force Expeditionary Forces: Implications for Future Military Operations60,99 €
Army Special Operations (ARSOF) are a significant contributing force in the Global War on Terrorism and have no explosive ordnance disposal (EOD) support other than on an ad hoc basis. The EOD support provided ARSOF, while competent and trained for conventional operations have not undergone any unique preparation for operations in support of ARSOF. There has been no formal effort to engage both ARSOF and EOD in order to optimize integration. This study assesses what can be done to insure that ARSOF is provided focused and trained EOD in support of missions in a unique operational environment. Conventional forces have ready access to EOD support though relationships established in the continental United States, the Combat Training Centers and past contingency operations. The Army's Cold War focus, resulted in EOD being organized and equipped primarily to support conventional forces. The operational environment has changed. The US can no longer expect to fight predominately high intensity mechanized battles on linear, contiguous battlefields. Future opponents will employ asymmetric methods in order to avoid our strengths. ARSOF is central to combating these threats. Proliferation of CBRN technology and the continued use of improvised explosive devices in attacks globally demands a rigorous research effort.
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.