Article 140 of the Constitution of Iraq - Güzel, h. c Mehmet Sükrü
32,99 €
inkl. MwSt.
Versandkostenfrei*
Versandfertig in 1-2 Wochen
payback
16 °P sammeln
  • Broschiertes Buch

This book aimed to prove that the Minority Protection Regime of Iraq is still in force and be the first of its kind by preventing a future potential legitimized new civil war in Iraq which originates and is premised on Article 140 of the Constitution of Iraq is further legitimized by the choice and breadth of the language used to describe it as "disputed internal territories" by the United Nations Security Council resolutions and the Secretary-General`s reports to the United Nations Security Council on Iraq.

Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
Produktbeschreibung
This book aimed to prove that the Minority Protection Regime of Iraq is still in force and be the first of its kind by preventing a future potential legitimized new civil war in Iraq which originates and is premised on Article 140 of the Constitution of Iraq is further legitimized by the choice and breadth of the language used to describe it as "disputed internal territories" by the United Nations Security Council resolutions and the Secretary-General`s reports to the United Nations Security Council on Iraq.
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.
Autorenporträt
This book aimed to prove that the Minority Protection Regime of Iraq is still in force and be the first of its kind by preventing a future potential legitimized new civil war in Iraq which originates and is premised on Article 140 of the Constitution of Iraq is further legitimized by the choice and breadth of the language used to describe it as "disputed internal territories" by the United Nations Security Council resolutions and the Secretary-General`s reports to the United Nations Security Council on Iraq. The potential for a new future civil war, which originates from and is premised on Article 140 of the 2005 Constitution of Iraq is further legitimized by the choice and breadth of the language used to describe it as "disputed internal territories" by the UN Security Council resolutions and the Secretary General`s report to the Security Council on Iraq. Iraq is one of the founders of the UN. Iraq was formed by its Declaration of Independence and recognized as a sovereign state by the League of Nations. Before the independence. Independence of Iraq in 1932 was a process of decolonization. Iraq was a colony of the UK under Article 22 of the Covenant of the League of Nations equivalent to the Chapter XII, International Trusteeship System of the UN Charter. When the independence of Iraq was the result of decolonization at the time, the rights acquired by the minorities are under the definition of jus cogens norms and the articles have erga omnes character The existence and the validity of the Minority Protection Regime of Iraq had nothing to do whether the UN decided to take the place of the League of Nations` Minority Protection Regime or not. The rights obtained by the minorities with the Minority Protection Regime of Iraq are the fundamental laws of Iraq within the concept of jus cogen norms, and no law, regulation or official action could conflict or interfere with these stipulations, nor any law, regulation or official action now or in the future could prevail over them as written in the Declaration of Independence. The Security Council has the main responsibility to prevent the future potential new civil war that was legitimized by its own resolutions in Iraq. This responsibility creates an obligation to the Security Council to ask from the ICJ a binding decision on the validity of the Minority Protection Regime of Iraq.At the same time, under his responsibility, arising from Article 99 of the UN Charter on preventive measures.