Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Challenges Facing Military Organizational Cultural Reform: A Study of the 2004 Air Force Materiel Command Reorganization]( "Challenges Facing Military Organizational Cultural Reform: A Study of the 2004 Air Force Materiel Command Reorganization")
Challenges Facing Military Organizational Cultural Reform: A Study of the 2004 Air Force Materiel Command Reorganization60,99 €![Blurred Strategy: Collaborating Civil-Military Interagency Doctrine for Post Conflict Operations]( "Blurred Strategy: Collaborating Civil-Military Interagency Doctrine for Post Conflict Operations")
Blurred Strategy: Collaborating Civil-Military Interagency Doctrine for Post Conflict Operations60,99 €![Interagency Coordination at Net Speed: Recommendations to Maximize Interagency Coordination and Capabilities at US CYBERCOM]( "Interagency Coordination at Net Speed: Recommendations to Maximize Interagency Coordination and Capabilities at US CYBERCOM")
Interagency Coordination at Net Speed: Recommendations to Maximize Interagency Coordination and Capabilities at US CYBERCOM60,99 €![Interagency Coordination to Protect US Diplomatic Facilities Abroad: Is Good, Good Enough?]( "Interagency Coordination to Protect US Diplomatic Facilities Abroad: Is Good, Good Enough?")
Interagency Coordination to Protect US Diplomatic Facilities Abroad: Is Good, Good Enough?60,99 €![Reorganization of Religious Forces in the Rural and Village Districts]( "Reorganization of Religious Forces in the Rural and Village Districts")
Reorganization of Religious Forces in the Rural and Village Districts60,99 €![Inss Strategic Perspectives 5: Joint Interagency Task Force-South: The Best Known, Least Understood Interagency Success]( "Inss Strategic Perspectives 5: Joint Interagency Task Force-South: The Best Known, Least Understood Interagency Success")
Inss Strategic Perspectives 5: Joint Interagency Task Force-South: The Best Known, Least Understood Interagency Success60,99 €![The Goldwater-Nichols Department of Defense Reorganization Act of 1986: An analysis of Air Force implementation of Title IV and its impact on the Air]( "The Goldwater-Nichols Department of Defense Reorganization Act of 1986: An analysis of Air Force implementation of Title IV and its impact on the Air")
The Goldwater-Nichols Department of Defense Reorganization Act of 1986: An analysis of Air Force implementation of Title IV and its impact on the Air60,99 €
US military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan caused the U.S. Government to reassess its interagency capabilities. In the wake of these conflicts, Congress held hearings in order to determine the strengths and weaknesses of the interagency process and evaluate different remedies. Numerous organizations and national security experts testified and presented their studies analyzing the interagency process and its shortcomings. Using the body of evidence presented to them, Senators Lugar and Biden made recommendations for revamping the interagency process. These studies presented compelling cases for change however, their recommendations failed to consider some significant factors. Much of the research focused on developing a new organizational structure without fully understanding the environment in which these organizations operate. Additionally, the studies failed to consider organizational theory and its application to the interagency process. Instead, the recommendations focused on accountability and efficiency but failed to consider information management and coordination among and between agencies. In order to account for the numerous factors impacting interagency coordination a detailed examination of the congressional requirements, "think tank" recommendations, the environment, and organizational theory were required. Two studies provide different approaches to organizational design. Beyond Goldwater-Nichols by the Center for Strategic and International Studies approached interagency reorganization using a traditional 20th century organizational design.