Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Assessment of the Report of Nasa's Planetary Protection Independent Review Board]( "Assessment of the Report of Nasa's Planetary Protection Independent Review Board")
Assessment of the Report of Nasa's Planetary Protection Independent Review Board51,99 €![Review and Assessment of Planetary Protection Policy Development Processes]( "Review and Assessment of Planetary Protection Policy Development Processes")
Review and Assessment of Planetary Protection Policy Development Processes67,99 €![A Midterm Assessment of Implementation of the Decadal Survey on Life and Physical Sciences Research at NASA]( "A Midterm Assessment of Implementation of the Decadal Survey on Life and Physical Sciences Research at NASA")
A Midterm Assessment of Implementation of the Decadal Survey on Life and Physical Sciences Research at NASA67,99 €![Review of the Mepag Report on Mars Special Regions]( "Review of the Mepag Report on Mars Special Regions")
Review of the Mepag Report on Mars Special Regions52,99 €![Review of the Restructured Research and Analysis Programs of Nasa's Planetary Science Division]( "Review of the Restructured Research and Analysis Programs of Nasa's Planetary Science Division")
Review of the Restructured Research and Analysis Programs of Nasa's Planetary Science Division72,99 €![Views of the U.S. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine on Agenda Items at Issue at the World Radiocommunication Conference 2023]( "Views of the U.S. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine on Agenda Items at Issue at the World Radiocommunication Conference 2023")
Views of the U.S. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine on Agenda Items at Issue at the World Radiocommunication Conference 202351,99 €![Review of NASA Plans for the International Space Station]( "Review of NASA Plans for the International Space Station")
Review of NASA Plans for the International Space Station33,99 €
At the request of the Advisory Committee for Geosciences of the National Science Foundation (NSF), a review of the Geospace Section of the NSF Division of Atmospheric and Geospace Sciences was undertaken in 2015. The Portfolio Review Committee was charged with reviewing the portfolio of facilities, research programs, and activities funded by Geospace Section and to recommend critical capabilities and the balance of investments needed to enable the science program articulated in the 2013 NRC decadal survey Solar and Space Physics: A Science for a Technological Society. The Portfolio Review Committee's report Investments in Critical Capabilities for Geospace Science 2016 to 2025 (ICCGS) was accepted by the Advisory Committee for Geosciences in April 2016. Assessment of the National Science Foundation's 2015 Geospace Portfolio Review provides an independent assessment of the ICCGS report. This publication assesses how well the ICCGS provides a clear set of findings, conclusions, and recommendations for Geospace Section that align with the science priorities of the NRC decadal survey, and adequately take into account issues such as the current budget outlook and the science needs of the community. Additionally, this study makes recommendations focused on options and considerations for NSF's implementation of the ICCGS recommendations.
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.