Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![The Civilian Putsch of 2018: Debunking the Myth of a Civil-Military Leadership Rift]( "The Civilian Putsch of 2018: Debunking the Myth of a Civil-Military Leadership Rift")
The Civilian Putsch of 2018: Debunking the Myth of a Civil-Military Leadership Rift60,99 €![The Myth of the Interagency Process: Applying British Models of Interagency Integration to Enhance US Nation-Building Operations]( "The Myth of the Interagency Process: Applying British Models of Interagency Integration to Enhance US Nation-Building Operations")
The Myth of the Interagency Process: Applying British Models of Interagency Integration to Enhance US Nation-Building Operations60,99 €![Tactical Deception Capabilities in the Heavy Division: Myth Versus Reality]( "Tactical Deception Capabilities in the Heavy Division: Myth Versus Reality")
Tactical Deception Capabilities in the Heavy Division: Myth Versus Reality60,99 €![Behind the Myth of the Jungle Superman: A Tactical Examination of the Japanese Army's Centrifugal Offensive, 7 December 1941 to 20 May 1942]( "Behind the Myth of the Jungle Superman: A Tactical Examination of the Japanese Army's Centrifugal Offensive, 7 December 1941 to 20 May 1942")
Behind the Myth of the Jungle Superman: A Tactical Examination of the Japanese Army's Centrifugal Offensive, 7 December 1941 to 20 May 194261,99 €![Deployability of the IBCT in 96 Hours: Fact or Myth?]( "Deployability of the IBCT in 96 Hours: Fact or Myth?")
Deployability of the IBCT in 96 Hours: Fact or Myth?60,99 €![Formal Sino-Singapore Defense Relation: Myth or Reality?]( "Formal Sino-Singapore Defense Relation: Myth or Reality?")
Formal Sino-Singapore Defense Relation: Myth or Reality?60,99 €![Casualty Aversion: Dispelling the Myth]( "Casualty Aversion: Dispelling the Myth")
Casualty Aversion: Dispelling the Myth60,99 €
The word asymmetric and theory of it is embedded in US joint and services doctrine, professional magazines, and countless other military publications. As such, the term is used with ever-increasing frequency in military jargon. A problem is derived from this: definitions of the term vary widely across and within the services. This creates a larger problem when service members attempt to apply or react to asymmetry in their profession. This study examines whether US service personnel have an appreciation for the doctrinal term asymmetric or asymmetry. This central question requires a review of joint and services doctrine as well as contemporary professional works on the topic. From this, the study compares the results of an inter-service survey to determine if service members have appreciation for asymmetry in military operations. Service members 19 appreciation for the term asymmetric is as broad as the definitions provided by US military doctrine. Personnel most associate asymmetry with the accepted English definition--imbalanced or not equal. This is not in accordance with the characteristics that doctrine provides. Without an appreciation of asymmetric methodology, US doctrine at all levels should abandon the word or make significant efforts to refine and train this doctrinal term and important concept.