Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Assessing Full Spectrum Bct Engineer Capability]( "Assessing Full Spectrum Bct Engineer Capability")
Assessing Full Spectrum Bct Engineer Capability60,99 €![Does the Future Engineer Force Transition Engineer Units Between Offensive and Stability Operations in Ways that Achieve Responsiveness, Versatility,]( "Does the Future Engineer Force Transition Engineer Units Between Offensive and Stability Operations in Ways that Achieve Responsiveness, Versatility,")
Does the Future Engineer Force Transition Engineer Units Between Offensive and Stability Operations in Ways that Achieve Responsiveness, Versatility,60,99 €![Future of Security Force Assistance: Is the Modular Brigade Combat Team the Right Organization?]( "Future of Security Force Assistance: Is the Modular Brigade Combat Team the Right Organization?")
Future of Security Force Assistance: Is the Modular Brigade Combat Team the Right Organization?60,99 €![Tactical Survivability: The Engineer Dilemma]( "Tactical Survivability: The Engineer Dilemma")
Tactical Survivability: The Engineer Dilemma60,99 €![White Space the Lack of Divisional Cavalry in the Modular Force]( "White Space the Lack of Divisional Cavalry in the Modular Force")
White Space the Lack of Divisional Cavalry in the Modular Force60,99 €![Supporting the Information-Centric 2001 Quadrennial Defense Review: The Case for an Information Service]( "Supporting the Information-Centric 2001 Quadrennial Defense Review: The Case for an Information Service")
Supporting the Information-Centric 2001 Quadrennial Defense Review: The Case for an Information Service60,99 €![The Modular Clock Algorithm for Blind Rendezvous]( "The Modular Clock Algorithm for Blind Rendezvous")
The Modular Clock Algorithm for Blind Rendezvous60,99 €
The Department of the Army decided to re-structure the combat divisions into modular, brigade units in order to better address the difficulty inherent in fighting a long war on terrorism, while simultaneously providing combat units to OIF and OEF for SSTR operations. These new modular combat units are based on predominantly infantry and armor capabilities and have resulted in a large divestiture of engineering units and capabilities. However, the Army's reduction in its premier re-construction capability lies in stark contrast to the US Department of Defense (DoD) policy directive 30000.05 of November 2005, stipulating for all services to address SSTR as a decisive operation commensurate with the resourcing given other service-specific combat operations. A better solution for the Army could be to invest in more engineer capability as the center-piece of its new modular BCTs. This seems more logical to produce flexible, capable forces rather than divesting the most relevant and flexible capability in the Army inventory: military engineering. This monograph will address the Army's challenge of implementing SSTR as a decisive operation as part of a main attempt to determine a method to "operationalize" a more engineer-centric concept. The BCT needs some capacity to produce longer term progress from the transient tactical victory of killing and capturing the enemy, while still maintaining its ability to conduct core missions of Offense, Defense, and SRO. As part of a search for viable capability design, the monograph will conduct a short survey of historical examples of the combat and construction capabilities of some venerable engineer formations. This survey will focus on engineers as the center-piece for current and future full-spectrum operations. 1940's and 1960's era engineer organization showed a clear ability to fight as well as build, enabling a robust capability for Full Spectrum success. What's more, in the manpower constrained environment of modern deployme