Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Posting of Workers within the European Union. The Enforcement Directive 2014/67/EU and shortfalls of existing legislation]( "Posting of Workers within the European Union. The Enforcement Directive 2014/67/EU and shortfalls of existing legislation")
Posting of Workers within the European Union. The Enforcement Directive 2014/67/EU and shortfalls of existing legislation27,95 €![The Complementarity Regime of the International Criminal Court]( "The Complementarity Regime of the International Criminal Court")
The Complementarity Regime of the International Criminal Court95,99 €![Legal and Commercial prospects of International Law on nuclear development in the 21st century and the right of Iran to Nuclear technology]( "Legal and Commercial prospects of International Law on nuclear development in the 21st century and the right of Iran to Nuclear technology")
Legal and Commercial prospects of International Law on nuclear development in the 21st century and the right of Iran to Nuclear technology39,99 €![Tactical Nuclear Weapons in International Humanitarian Law]( "Tactical Nuclear Weapons in International Humanitarian Law")
Tactical Nuclear Weapons in International Humanitarian Law15,95 €![Extradition Laws in the International and Indian Regime]( "Extradition Laws in the International and Indian Regime")
Extradition Laws in the International and Indian Regime74,99 €![Protection of Refugee Women in Present International Legal Regime]( "Protection of Refugee Women in Present International Legal Regime")
Protection of Refugee Women in Present International Legal Regime38,99 €![International Liability Regime for Biodiversity Damage]( "International Liability Regime for Biodiversity Damage")
International Liability Regime for Biodiversity Damage134,99 €
Essay from the year 2013 in the subject Law - European and International Law, Intellectual Properties, grade: merit, Queen Mary University of London (Department of Law), course: LLM, language: English, abstract: In this essay I would like to argue that the existing international nuclear liability framework cannot prevent great nuclear disasters. I will start with some considerations about Chernobyl and Fukushima, and then my discussion will continue with a framework of the international legal provisions that address related clauses of liability. I attempted to furnish plausible interpretation of the existing international legal framework before arriving at conclusion about the efficiency of this framework. The nuclear accidents of Chernobyl, USSR in 1986 and Fukushima, Japan in 2011 rekindled serious and thought provoking discussions among the scientific communities, policy planners and beneficiaries of the world to understand whether the existing legal liability ensures the nuclear safeguards to the world for continued use of the nuclear technology at the cost of human and environmental tragedies. A thorough review of these two nuclear tragedies in light of legal provisions is made in the subsequent sections to understand [...]
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.