In this annual review from the Cato Institute, Ilya Shapiro and leading legal scholars analyze the 2017-2018 Supreme Court term, specifically the most important and far-reaching cases of the year, plus cases coming up. Now in its seventeenth edition, the Review is the first scholarly journal to appear after the term's end and the only one grounded in the nation's first principles, liberty, and limited government.
In this annual review from the Cato Institute, Ilya Shapiro and leading legal scholars analyze the 2017-2018 Supreme Court term, specifically the most important and far-reaching cases of the year, plus cases coming up. Now in its seventeenth edition, the Review is the first scholarly journal to appear after the term's end and the only one grounded in the nation's first principles, liberty, and limited government.Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.
Ilya Shapiro is a senior fellow in constitutional studies and editor-in-chief of the Cato Supreme Court Review. Before joining Cato he was Special Assistant/Advisor to the Multi-National Force-Iraq on rule of law issues; practiced international, political, commercial, and antitrust litigation at Patton Boggs LLP and Cleary Gottlieb LLP; and clerked on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Mr. Shapiro has written for a wide variety of publications and regularly appears on TV and radio to comment on legal issues. Mr. Shapiro holds degrees from Princeton University, the London School of Economics, and the University of Chicago Law School, and has been an adjunct professor at the George Washington University Law School.
Inhaltsangabe
FOREWORD - The Review's publisher... TBD By Roger Pilon AFFIRMATIVE ACTION - Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin - For a second time, the Court looks at whether and how UT-Austin can use racial preferences in admissions. By Peter Kirsanow EXECUTIVE POWER AND IMMIGRATION - United States v. Texas - Is President Obama's executive action on immigration legal? By Josh Blackman ONE PERSON, ONE VOTE - Evenwel v. Abbott - When states draw legislative districts, must they equalize people or voters? By Hans von Spakovsky RELIGIOUS LIBERTY - Zubik v. Burwell - Various religious nonprofits contend that the "accommodation" to Obamacare's contraceptive mandate still violates their rights under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act. By Mark Rienzi JUDICIAL SCRUTINY AND ABORTION - Whole Women's Health v. Hellerstadt - How much should courts look into whether regulations actually serve the governmental interest asserted to justify them. By Elizabeth Price Foley PUBLIC CORRUPTION - McDonnell v. United States - Former Virginia governor Bob McDonnell accepted gifts from and met with a businessman, but never used his power to help him (nor pressured others to do so). Can his behavior still be prosecuted? By Harvey Silverglate & Emma Quinn-Judge PROPERTY RIGHTS - U.S. Army Corps. of Engineers v. Hawkes Co. - Can property owners go to court to challenge an agency action that imperils the use of their land? By Steven Eagle Asset FOrfeiture - Luis v. United States - Does the pretrial freeze of assets unconnected to any crime violate a defendant's Sixth Amendment right to counsel of choice? By David B. Smith, Gabriel Latner, Terrance G. Reed & Howard Srebnick CLASS ACTIONS - Tyson Foods Inc. v. Bouaphakeo - Can a class action be certified based on statistical sampling even though this guarantees that, if the lawsuit is successful, some class members will be overcompensated and others undercompensated? By Andrew J. Trask SPECIAL FEATURES INCLUDE ON ORIGINALISM AND LIBERTY - In this written version of the 2015 B. Kenneth Simon Lecture in Constitutional Thought, Professor Steven G. Calabresi examines the relevance of Magna Carta and natural rights to liberty under U.S. constitutional law. LOOKING AHEAD - Law professor and "Instapundit" Glenn Harlan Reynolds takes a gander at the 2016-2017 term.
FOREWORD - The Review's publisher... TBD By Roger Pilon AFFIRMATIVE ACTION - Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin - For a second time, the Court looks at whether and how UT-Austin can use racial preferences in admissions. By Peter Kirsanow EXECUTIVE POWER AND IMMIGRATION - United States v. Texas - Is President Obama's executive action on immigration legal? By Josh Blackman ONE PERSON, ONE VOTE - Evenwel v. Abbott - When states draw legislative districts, must they equalize people or voters? By Hans von Spakovsky RELIGIOUS LIBERTY - Zubik v. Burwell - Various religious nonprofits contend that the "accommodation" to Obamacare's contraceptive mandate still violates their rights under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act. By Mark Rienzi JUDICIAL SCRUTINY AND ABORTION - Whole Women's Health v. Hellerstadt - How much should courts look into whether regulations actually serve the governmental interest asserted to justify them. By Elizabeth Price Foley PUBLIC CORRUPTION - McDonnell v. United States - Former Virginia governor Bob McDonnell accepted gifts from and met with a businessman, but never used his power to help him (nor pressured others to do so). Can his behavior still be prosecuted? By Harvey Silverglate & Emma Quinn-Judge PROPERTY RIGHTS - U.S. Army Corps. of Engineers v. Hawkes Co. - Can property owners go to court to challenge an agency action that imperils the use of their land? By Steven Eagle Asset FOrfeiture - Luis v. United States - Does the pretrial freeze of assets unconnected to any crime violate a defendant's Sixth Amendment right to counsel of choice? By David B. Smith, Gabriel Latner, Terrance G. Reed & Howard Srebnick CLASS ACTIONS - Tyson Foods Inc. v. Bouaphakeo - Can a class action be certified based on statistical sampling even though this guarantees that, if the lawsuit is successful, some class members will be overcompensated and others undercompensated? By Andrew J. Trask SPECIAL FEATURES INCLUDE ON ORIGINALISM AND LIBERTY - In this written version of the 2015 B. Kenneth Simon Lecture in Constitutional Thought, Professor Steven G. Calabresi examines the relevance of Magna Carta and natural rights to liberty under U.S. constitutional law. LOOKING AHEAD - Law professor and "Instapundit" Glenn Harlan Reynolds takes a gander at the 2016-2017 term.
Es gelten unsere Allgemeinen Geschäftsbedingungen: www.buecher.de/agb
Impressum
www.buecher.de ist ein Internetauftritt der buecher.de internetstores GmbH
Geschäftsführung: Monica Sawhney | Roland Kölbl | Günter Hilger
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Batheyer Straße 115 - 117, 58099 Hagen
Postanschrift: Bürgermeister-Wegele-Str. 12, 86167 Augsburg
Amtsgericht Hagen HRB 13257
Steuernummer: 321/5800/1497
USt-IdNr: DE450055826
![Review of the Judgments of the Supreme Court in the Queen Vs. Joseph Chasson [microform]](https://bilder.buecher.de/produkte/66/66195/66195925m.jpg "Review of the Judgments of the Supreme Court in the Queen Vs. Joseph Chasson [microform]")