Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Differential Undercounts in the U.S. Census]( "Differential Undercounts in the U.S. Census")
Differential Undercounts in the U.S. Census15,99 €![Forecasting International Migration in Europe: A Bayesian View]( "Forecasting International Migration in Europe: A Bayesian View")
Forecasting International Migration in Europe: A Bayesian View74,99 €![Forecasting International Migration in Europe: A Bayesian View]( "Forecasting International Migration in Europe: A Bayesian View")
Forecasting International Migration in Europe: A Bayesian View74,99 €![The Method of Response Functions in Psychology and Sociology]( "The Method of Response Functions in Psychology and Sociology")
The Method of Response Functions in Psychology and Sociology246,99 €![The Roots of Patriarchy]( "The Roots of Patriarchy")
The Roots of Patriarchy201,99 €![Ethnicity and Integration]( "Ethnicity and Integration")
Ethnicity and Integration110,99 €![Spatial and Social Disparities]( "Spatial and Social Disparities")
Spatial and Social Disparities74,99 €
In provocative terms that push the envelope of technical, administrative, and legal capabilities, Swanson and Walashek propose a re-vamped US census based neither on the current system, self-enumeration, nor its predecessor, door-to-door canvassing. Instead, they propose that it be built on a combination of four elements: (1) administrative records; (2) the continuously updated Master Address File; (3) survey data; and (4) modeling and imputation techniques. They use "Census-Enhanced Master Address File (CEMAF) as a descriptive term for their proposal, which is based on four principles and includes a proposal for an independent Census Bureau.
They argue that evidence suggests that the methods used to conduct traditional census counts may be at the end of their useful working lives, as evidenced by increasing costs and declining response rates. Some of their ideas will seem farfetched. However, Swanson and Walashek believe this is the time to discuss radical proposals as governments re-examine the utility of traditional census counts and consider reductions, as is the case in Canada and England.
This SpringerBriefs should be on the reading list of staff in statistical agencies grappling with rising costs and declining response rates, as well as census stakeholders concerned about costs, accuracy, and census utility.
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.
They argue that evidence suggests that the methods used to conduct traditional census counts may be at the end of their useful working lives, as evidenced by increasing costs and declining response rates. Some of their ideas will seem farfetched. However, Swanson and Walashek believe this is the time to discuss radical proposals as governments re-examine the utility of traditional census counts and consider reductions, as is the case in Canada and England.
This SpringerBriefs should be on the reading list of staff in statistical agencies grappling with rising costs and declining response rates, as well as census stakeholders concerned about costs, accuracy, and census utility.
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.