Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Advancing the U.S. Air Force's Force-Development Initiative]( "Advancing the U.S. Air Force's Force-Development Initiative")
Advancing the U.S. Air Force's Force-Development Initiative17,99 €![How Should the Army Use Contractors on the Battlefield? Assessing Comparative Risk in Sourcing Decisions]( "How Should the Army Use Contractors on the Battlefield? Assessing Comparative Risk in Sourcing Decisions")
How Should the Army Use Contractors on the Battlefield? Assessing Comparative Risk in Sourcing Decisions26,99 €![Conserving the Future Force Fighting Strength]( "Conserving the Future Force Fighting Strength")
Conserving the Future Force Fighting Strength22,99 €![Characterizing the North Korean Nuclear Missile Threat]( "Characterizing the North Korean Nuclear Missile Threat")
Characterizing the North Korean Nuclear Missile Threat42,99 €![Determinants of Productivity for Military Personnel]( "Determinants of Productivity for Military Personnel")
Determinants of Productivity for Military Personnel23,99 €![Creating Readiness Metrics for the Army Civilian Workforce]( "Creating Readiness Metrics for the Army Civilian Workforce")
Creating Readiness Metrics for the Army Civilian Workforce31,99 €![Characterizing and Exploring the Implications of Maritime Irregular Warfare]( "Characterizing and Exploring the Implications of Maritime Irregular Warfare")
Characterizing and Exploring the Implications of Maritime Irregular Warfare27,99 €
During the 1990s, questions arose about how future changes in military missions, organizations, and technology would affect work and workers in the Department of Defense (DoD). To address these questions, RAND undertook analysis of the effects of the future environment on the characteristics of DoD work and workers. Using the Department of Labors Occupational Information Network (O*NET) and teh O*NET Analyst Database, military and civilian ocupational analysts assigned new ratings scores to O*NET occupational dimensions, predicated on a general description of the future DoD environment derived primarily from Joint Vision 2010 and related documents. RAND then analyzed the differences between future and past scores. Despite the many changes anticipated in DoD processes, relatively few characteristics are expected to change. Given existing selection and training processes, current and prospective workforces should be able to adapt to the expected changes, which separate into four broad themes: