Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![The Origin of Species: By Means of Natural Selection or the Preservation of Favored Races in the Struggle for Life]( "The Origin of Species: By Means of Natural Selection or the Preservation of Favored Races in the Struggle for Life")
The Origin of Species: By Means of Natural Selection or the Preservation of Favored Races in the Struggle for Life11,99 €![The Doctrine of Natural Selection]( "The Doctrine of Natural Selection")
The Doctrine of Natural Selection13,99 €![Genetic Structure and Selection in Subdivided Populations]( "Genetic Structure and Selection in Subdivided Populations")
Genetic Structure and Selection in Subdivided Populations107,99 €![The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex 2 Volume Set]( "The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex 2 Volume Set")
The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex 2 Volume Set115,99 €![The Paradox of Evolution: The Strange Relationship Between Natural Selection and Reproduction]( "The Paradox of Evolution: The Strange Relationship Between Natural Selection and Reproduction")
The Paradox of Evolution: The Strange Relationship Between Natural Selection and Reproduction15,99 €![The Evolution of Complexity by Means of Natural Selection]( "The Evolution of Complexity by Means of Natural Selection")
The Evolution of Complexity by Means of Natural Selection62,99 €![Contributions To The Theory Of Natural Selection]( "Contributions To The Theory Of Natural Selection")
Contributions To The Theory Of Natural Selection28,99 €
Describes the hypothesis that Darwin's "natural selection," reformulated by R.A. Fisher, J.B.S. Haldane, and S. Wright in the light of Mendelian genetics, is the exclusive mechanism for biological evolution. During the 1930s, alternatives such as Lamarchism, macromutations, and orthogenesis were rejected in favor of natural selection acting on small mutations, but there were disagreements about the role of random genetic drift in evolution. By the 1950s, research by T. Dobzhansky, E.B. Ford, and others persuaded leading evolutionists that natural selection was so powerful that drift was unimportant. This conclusion was accepted by most; however, some biology textbooks and popular articles mentioned drift in the late 1960s.