Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![The Frontrunner's Fall in the Democratic Primary 2008. Analyze of Clinton¿s Run]( "The Frontrunner's Fall in the Democratic Primary 2008. Analyze of Clinton¿s Run")
The Frontrunner's Fall in the Democratic Primary 2008. Analyze of Clinton¿s Run17,95 €![Will further EU enlargement cause a crisis in the EU? An analysis]( "Will further EU enlargement cause a crisis in the EU? An analysis")
Will further EU enlargement cause a crisis in the EU? An analysis17,95 €![Not Part of the Game? The Anglo-Chilean Alliance of the Falklands War]( "Not Part of the Game? The Anglo-Chilean Alliance of the Falklands War")
Not Part of the Game? The Anglo-Chilean Alliance of the Falklands War27,95 €![EU-Beitritt der Türkei: Enlargement fatigue oder ein Spezialfall?]( "EU-Beitritt der Türkei: Enlargement fatigue oder ein Spezialfall?")
EU-Beitritt der Türkei: Enlargement fatigue oder ein Spezialfall?17,95 €![The European Integration, Vol. 1]( "The European Integration, Vol. 1")
The European Integration, Vol. 181,99 €![Humanitäre Interventionen, Democratic Enlargement - die Präsidentschaft Clinton 1993-2000]( "Humanitäre Interventionen, Democratic Enlargement - die Präsidentschaft Clinton 1993-2000")
Humanitäre Interventionen, Democratic Enlargement - die Präsidentschaft Clinton 1993-200017,95 €![Does an enlargement of the European Union inhibit the party establishment of a European party system? Case study of Turkey]( "Does an enlargement of the European Union inhibit the party establishment of a European party system? Case study of Turkey")
Does an enlargement of the European Union inhibit the party establishment of a European party system? Case study of Turkey17,95 €
Essay from the year 2015 in the subject Politics - International Politics - Region: USA, grade: A, University of California, Los Angeles, course: Foreign relations of the U.S., language: English, abstract: This article examines why President Clinton decided to expand NATO, a military alliance that was built to defend against the Soviet Union, an enemy which was already defeated. NATO enlargement is even more interesting considering it was done in a time of peace. The decision to enlarge was largely a surprise. Most alliances either end when their adversary is gone or slowly erode, NATO on the other hand expanded. How President Clinton came to that decision and the reasons he did so are analyzed in this paper. In this paper I argue that Clinton was largely influenced through other players, including key foreign leaders and congressional republicans. He did however have good security reasons to do so as well. The enlargement of NATO had consequences that were both beneficial and detrimental. The positive and negative consequences of the decision to enlarge NATO are looked at through a military strategic, foreign relations, and economic perspective. The military strategic perspective is analyzed in terms of what resources and territorial rights the new countries allow NATO to have. The foreign relations perspective is seen in light in the worsening of U.S.-Russian relations. The economic perspective is looked at how much it costs the alliance financially to expand eastward.
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.