Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Traditional Methods and Community Participation in Forest Conservation]( "Traditional Methods and Community Participation in Forest Conservation")
Traditional Methods and Community Participation in Forest Conservation32,99 €![Community Participation and Food Security in Rural Zimbabwe]( "Community Participation and Food Security in Rural Zimbabwe")
Community Participation and Food Security in Rural Zimbabwe42,99 €![Management and Conservation of Forest Resources]( "Management and Conservation of Forest Resources")
Management and Conservation of Forest Resources38,99 €![DECENTRALIZED FOREST RESOURCE MANAGEMENT IN ETHIOPIA:]( "DECENTRALIZED FOREST RESOURCE MANAGEMENT IN ETHIOPIA:")
DECENTRALIZED FOREST RESOURCE MANAGEMENT IN ETHIOPIA:38,99 €![Women's Participation in Community Forest Management:]( "Women's Participation in Community Forest Management:")
Women's Participation in Community Forest Management:32,99 €![The Role of Community Forest in Local Development of Nepal]( "The Role of Community Forest in Local Development of Nepal")
The Role of Community Forest in Local Development of Nepal23,99 €![Post Formation Support of Community Forest User Groups]( "Post Formation Support of Community Forest User Groups")
Post Formation Support of Community Forest User Groups32,99 €
The objective of this study was to assess existing participation of Ameya Woreda community in forest resource conservation (2013). Opinion survey, semi-structured interview, personal observation, and focus group discussion were employed to obtain primary and secondary data. 184 samples respondents were contacted in the case obtaining primary data. The data collected from primary sources were analyzed using descriptive statistics including some quantitative analysis: frequency, percentage and charts. The result revealed that even when different strategies were employed in conservation of forest resource, there were many problems that affected its effectiveness such as agricultural land expansion (77%), weak enforcement of forest resources laws (65%), increased demand for fuel wood from open access forests (81%) and low coverage of improved firewood stove (30%). However, open access forests were identified with low community participation.