Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![What Lessons Can Be Drawn from U.S. Riverine Operations During the Vietnam War as the U.S. Navy Moves Into the Twenty-First Century?]( "What Lessons Can Be Drawn from U.S. Riverine Operations During the Vietnam War as the U.S. Navy Moves Into the Twenty-First Century?")
What Lessons Can Be Drawn from U.S. Riverine Operations During the Vietnam War as the U.S. Navy Moves Into the Twenty-First Century?60,99 €![Is the U.S. Navy Prepared to Conduct Peace Operations in Support of the National Security Strategy?]( "Is the U.S. Navy Prepared to Conduct Peace Operations in Support of the National Security Strategy?")
Is the U.S. Navy Prepared to Conduct Peace Operations in Support of the National Security Strategy?62,99 €![From Burma to Baghdad: Enhancing the Synergy Between Land-Based Special Forces and Combat Air Operations]( "From Burma to Baghdad: Enhancing the Synergy Between Land-Based Special Forces and Combat Air Operations")
From Burma to Baghdad: Enhancing the Synergy Between Land-Based Special Forces and Combat Air Operations60,99 €![US Army Land Navigation in the 21st Century]( "US Army Land Navigation in the 21st Century")
US Army Land Navigation in the 21st Century63,99 €![The Functions and Structure of Nuclear Deterrence in the Post-Cold War World]( "The Functions and Structure of Nuclear Deterrence in the Post-Cold War World")
The Functions and Structure of Nuclear Deterrence in the Post-Cold War World60,99 €![Can the U.S. Navy Afford to Lose Its AMCM/Heavy Lift Helicopter Capability?]( "Can the U.S. Navy Afford to Lose Its AMCM/Heavy Lift Helicopter Capability?")
Can the U.S. Navy Afford to Lose Its AMCM/Heavy Lift Helicopter Capability?61,99 €![The Royal Norwegian Air Force in the Post Cold War Era: Effectiveness in Expeditionary Operations]( "The Royal Norwegian Air Force in the Post Cold War Era: Effectiveness in Expeditionary Operations")
The Royal Norwegian Air Force in the Post Cold War Era: Effectiveness in Expeditionary Operations62,99 €
This study examines a comparison of land based antisubmarine warfare (ASW) operations using U.S. Army aircraft during World War 2 and the U.S. Navy's P-3 Orion during the Cold War. Through both wars, land based ASW aircraft provided the U.S. military an outreaching arm that limited the striking potential of enemy submarines. This thesis investigates the comparison in more depth by using four of the nine principles of war: (1) objective, (2) offensive, (3) maneuver, and (4) surprise. Deterrence was the national strategy used to keep submarines from becoming a potential aggressor during both wars. The Navy's P-3 Orion, land based throughout the Atlantic, was able to provide a credible deterrent against Soviet submarines since its introduction to the fleet in 1962. U.S. Army aircraft of World War 2 used in fighting the German U-boats, on the other hand, progressed into a credible deterrent in their temporary role of ASW. The author examines the short lived history of U.S. Army land based operations (approximately two years) and the extended history of the U.S. Navy land based operations and suggests that despite technological advances onboard both service's aircraft, land based ASW has changed very little after fifty years. This study also indicates that there lies a significant need in pursuing and continuing the capabilities of a land based ASW aircraft.
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.