Comparative Judicial Review and Public Policy

Herausgeber: Jackson, Donald; Tate, C.

• Gebundenes Buch

Produktbeschreibung

This is one of the few book-length analyses of judicial review and public policy in very different parts of the world today. Donald W. Jackson and C. Neal Tate have gathered together respected scholars and set forth a framework for comparative analysis into the origins of judicial review, its use as a policy tool, and its exercise and impact in the policy-making process. Political scientists, public policy analysts, and public administrators will find this a thought-provoking study in comparative politics and public administration and a useful classroom text. The text opens with an overview and a delineation of basic concepts and closes with a framework for analyzing the exercise of judicial review in policy making. The major part of the book offers case studies and analyses of the establishment of judicial review as a policy tool, and the impact of judicial review in various types of legal situations. These studies cover twelve countries, including the United States, Great Britain, Japan, India, Israel, and the USSR, among others. Chapter reference lists and a selected bibliography at the end of the book refer readers to current studies of importance.

---

Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.

Produktdetails

• Verlag: Praeger
• Seitenzahl: 228
• Erscheinungstermin: 17. September 1992
• Englisch
• Abmessung: 240mm x 161mm x 17mm
• Gewicht: 511g
• ISBN-13: 9780313286155
• ISBN-10: 0313286159
• Artikelnr.: 25140395

Autorenporträt

DONALD W. JACKSON is the Herman Brown Professor of Political Science at Texas Christian University. He has served as Judicial Fellow at the U.S. Supreme Court, and his teaching and research cover a broad range of topics on American and comparative judicial processes. C. NEAL TATE is Regents' Professor of Political Science at the University of North Texas and the immediate past Chair of the Research Committee on Comparative Judicial Studies of the International Political Science Association. He has published extensively on the courts of the Philippines and the United States.

Inhaltsangabe

Comparative Judicial Review and Public Policy Comparative Judicial Review
and Public Policy: Concepts and Overview by C. Neal Tate Establishing
Judicial Review as a Policy Tool Documenting the Establishment of Judicial
Review: Japan and the United States by David J. Danelski The Growth of
Canadian Judicial Review and the Commonwealth and American Experiences by
Peter H. Russell Abstract Constitutional Review and Policy Making in
Western Europe by Alec Stone Establishing and Exercising Judicial Review in
the Soviet Union: The Beginnings by William Kitchin Judicial Review and Its
Policy Impacts Social Action Litigation in India: The Operation and Limits
of the World's Most Active Judiciary by Carl Baar Judicial Review and
Public Policy in Italy: American Roots and the Italian Hybrid by Mary L.
Volcansek Temerity and Timidity in the Exercise of Judicial Review in the
Philippine Supreme Court by C. Neal Tate Judicial Review and the Rule of
Law: Comparing the United States and Sweden by Nils Stjernquist The
Incidence and Effect of Judicial Review: Procedures Against Central
Government in the United Kingdom by Maurice Sunkin Judicial Review and
Israel's Struggle for a Written Constitution by Martin Edelman Logic and
the Exercise of Judicial Review in Policy Making Original Intent, Strict
Construction, and Judicial Review: A Framework for Comparative Analysis by
Donald W. Jackson Selected Bibliography on Comparative Judicial Review
Index