Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Comparison of the efficacy of intrusion arches and mini implant]( "Comparison of the efficacy of intrusion arches and mini implant")
Comparison of the efficacy of intrusion arches and mini implant29,99 €![Comparison between Apex locator & IOPA grid technique: An Invivo Study]( "Comparison between Apex locator & IOPA grid technique: An Invivo Study")
Comparison between Apex locator & IOPA grid technique: An Invivo Study26,99 €![Accuracy of IOPA & OPG in 3rd Molar Surgery with CBCT as Gold Standard]( "Accuracy of IOPA & OPG in 3rd Molar Surgery with CBCT as Gold Standard")
Accuracy of IOPA & OPG in 3rd Molar Surgery with CBCT as Gold Standard32,99 €![Genauigkeit von IOPA und OPG in der Chirurgie der dritten Molaren mit CBCT als Goldstandard]( "Genauigkeit von IOPA und OPG in der Chirurgie der dritten Molaren mit CBCT als Goldstandard")
Genauigkeit von IOPA und OPG in der Chirurgie der dritten Molaren mit CBCT als Goldstandard49,90 €![Efficacy of CPP-ACP & CPP-ACPF on Micro Hardness of Bleached Enamel]( "Efficacy of CPP-ACP & CPP-ACPF on Micro Hardness of Bleached Enamel")
Efficacy of CPP-ACP & CPP-ACPF on Micro Hardness of Bleached Enamel26,99 €![Precisión de IOPA y OPG en la cirugía del 3er molar con CBCT como patrón de referencia]( "Precisión de IOPA y OPG en la cirugía del 3er molar con CBCT como patrón de referencia")
Precisión de IOPA y OPG en la cirugía del 3er molar con CBCT como patrón de referencia34,99 €![Precisão da IOPA e OPG na cirurgia de terceiros molares com CBCT como padrão de ouro]( "Precisão da IOPA e OPG na cirurgia de terceiros molares com CBCT como padrão de ouro")
Precisão da IOPA e OPG na cirurgia de terceiros molares com CBCT como padrão de ouro32,99 €
The long term success of endosseus implants depends mainly on the preservation of bone support.Radiological studies to evaluate changes in marginal peri-implant bone height during implant recall programme are widely acceptable to appreciate this bone support and its long term outcome.Rehabilitation through dental implants which was once a domain of multispeciality metropolitan hospitals is being undertaken by dentists all over the nation. In metropolitan cities, the availability of advanced radiographic techniques like Dentascan promise accuracy and reliability. However these techniques are inaccessible to the implantologist and the patient in suburban areas .Considering Orthopantomographs and Intraoral radiographs are being exposed as a part of the daily routine of dental clinics, hospitals and teaching institutes for implant purposes, an attempt has been made to compare and evaluate the difference if any, in the postoperative outcome of these two radiographic techniques. Also, the agreement between the two techniques in assessment of various landmarks around dental implants has been compared.