Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![SOCIAL COMPLEXITY AND THE ORIGINS OF AGRICULTURE]( "SOCIAL COMPLEXITY AND THE ORIGINS OF AGRICULTURE")
SOCIAL COMPLEXITY AND THE ORIGINS OF AGRICULTURE51,99 €![Contemporary Emigration from Latvia to the United Kingdom]( "Contemporary Emigration from Latvia to the United Kingdom")
Contemporary Emigration from Latvia to the United Kingdom38,99 €![Between Goethe and Complexity]( "Between Goethe and Complexity")
Between Goethe and Complexity51,99 €![Attitude Towards the Contemporary Language Policy of Ethiopia]( "Attitude Towards the Contemporary Language Policy of Ethiopia")
Attitude Towards the Contemporary Language Policy of Ethiopia44,99 €![Accessing Knowledge to Inform Policy through Complexity and Action Research]( "Accessing Knowledge to Inform Policy through Complexity and Action Research")
Accessing Knowledge to Inform Policy through Complexity and Action Research51,99 €![The Metamorphosis of Gottfredson and Hirschi's General Theory of Crime]( "The Metamorphosis of Gottfredson and Hirschi's General Theory of Crime")
The Metamorphosis of Gottfredson and Hirschi's General Theory of Crime51,99 €![The Essentials of Theory U]( "The Essentials of Theory U")
The Essentials of Theory U19,06 €
Most observers still adhere to the belief that
single, heroic leaders initiate major change in
contemporary human organizations. This "great
person" paradigm seems especially strong when such
change implements a new method of meeting the
organization''s central goals. Huck seeks to test this
paradigm by studying the implementation of web-based
education at a university in the United States.
Huck''s findings, based on ethnographic field
research, tend to refute the "myth" of change by a
principal authority in the organization. Instead,
Huck finds that the constructs of Complexity Theory
better explain the processes and outcomes of change
in human groups. Huck argues that change in the
contemporary U.S. university is the product of
individual interactions that are usually inductive
and parochial, but which retain the potential to
cascade across an organization and transform it.
single, heroic leaders initiate major change in
contemporary human organizations. This "great
person" paradigm seems especially strong when such
change implements a new method of meeting the
organization''s central goals. Huck seeks to test this
paradigm by studying the implementation of web-based
education at a university in the United States.
Huck''s findings, based on ethnographic field
research, tend to refute the "myth" of change by a
principal authority in the organization. Instead,
Huck finds that the constructs of Complexity Theory
better explain the processes and outcomes of change
in human groups. Huck argues that change in the
contemporary U.S. university is the product of
individual interactions that are usually inductive
and parochial, but which retain the potential to
cascade across an organization and transform it.