Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Ispowed' mudrosti]( "Ispowed' mudrosti")
Ispowed' mudrosti42,99 €![Confession de sagesse]( "Confession de sagesse")
Confession de sagesse42,99 €![Who should be included in, and who excluded from, the club of rights-holders?]( "Who should be included in, and who excluded from, the club of rights-holders?")
Who should be included in, and who excluded from, the club of rights-holders?15,95 €![Human Rights and Universal Duties]( "Human Rights and Universal Duties")
Human Rights and Universal Duties164,99 €![Anthropogenic moral fallacies paralyze action against climate change. Why rethinking is necessary]( "Anthropogenic moral fallacies paralyze action against climate change. Why rethinking is necessary")
Anthropogenic moral fallacies paralyze action against climate change. Why rethinking is necessary17,95 €![SOCRATES AND THE CARE OF SELF AND OTHERS]( "SOCRATES AND THE CARE OF SELF AND OTHERS")
SOCRATES AND THE CARE OF SELF AND OTHERS29,99 €![The science of philosophy. Book Three. Ideology of Man and State]( "The science of philosophy. Book Three. Ideology of Man and State")
The science of philosophy. Book Three. Ideology of Man and State42,99 €
Up to now "philosophy" is thought to be the science of the most general laws of the development of nature, human society and thinking. Aristotle understood it this way nearly 2,500 years ago, considering philosophy "a science of knowing certain foundations and beginnings.... The correct name for philosophy is truth," he said, "for the aim of theorizing is truth, the aim of practice is doing. The German philosopher Edmund Husserl, closer to our time, held precisely the same opinion about philosophy, regarding it as "a science of true beginnings, of sources... And, - he wrote at the beginning of this century, - if we imagine it in ideal completeness, it will be the reason itself, which along with itself and above itself cannot have any authority. This is how many great philosophers understood philosophy, considering it the highest achievement of mankind. And the point here is not to pose some profound question, but to be able to answer it - and to answer it "scientifically, i.e., in a way that is obligatory for every reasonable person.