Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Basic Forms of Government]( "Basic Forms of Government")
Basic Forms of Government44,99 €![Rules, Forms and Schedule of Fees issued by Irish Land Commission, October 1881]( "Rules, Forms and Schedule of Fees issued by Irish Land Commission, October 1881")
Rules, Forms and Schedule of Fees issued by Irish Land Commission, October 188112,90 €![Forms of Communication in Diplomacy]( "Forms of Communication in Diplomacy")
Forms of Communication in Diplomacy32,99 €![Forms of the Bourgeois Class Struggle]( "Forms of the Bourgeois Class Struggle")
Forms of the Bourgeois Class Struggle44,95 €![TOBACCO USE]( "TOBACCO USE")
TOBACCO USE38,99 €![From Geopolitics to Geoeconomics]( "From Geopolitics to Geoeconomics")
From Geopolitics to Geoeconomics38,99 €![European Security and Defence Policy in 2003]( "European Security and Defence Policy in 2003")
European Security and Defence Policy in 200332,99 €
This study examines the potential of and limits to the use of the internet as a public sphere, especially the claim that the Internet is or can be a public sphere. Whilst a number of studies have debated whether or not the internet is a public sphere, here Salter undertakes a conceptual analysis of public sphere theory and the socio-structural context in which public spheres are situated, thus drawing on the wider corpus of Habermas's work to paying special attention to the thesis of colonisation'. Salter shows how activists must create radical public spheres through both communication and action, as well as through engagement with the technologies they must form the technologies themselves, resisting processes of economic and state colonisation. The limits to the use of the Internet as a public sphere are not, however, inherent features of the technology itself, but pertain to its use under a system in which certain social practices and institutions have priority over others. Under these conditions, the use of the Internet as a radical public sphere takes place as a continual struggle against dominant forms of use.