Dieter Grimm

Constitutional Courts and Judicial Review

Between Law and Politics
Herausgeber: Barzun, Charles; Klatt, Matthias; Visser, Maartje De

• Gebundenes Buch

Produktbeschreibung

A collection of essays from Dieter Grimm, Germany's most renowned constitutional scholar, shining a light on the jurisprudence of the German Constitutional Court. Established in 1951, the court has become a blueprint for new courts ever since and its jurisprudence, particularly in the field of fundamental rights, has influenced the decisions of judges throughout the world. After the seismic constitutional changes of the years 1989-90 in Germany and beyond, many countries adopted new democratic constitutions and established constitutional courts in order to make their constitutions effective. Today, many of these courts are under attack both politically and intellectually. In this book, Grimm considers some of the fundamental questions under academic scrutiny today: are constitutional courts political or legal institutions? Is judicial review a political or a legal activity? Is it a threat to, or a condition, of democracy? Should these courts be abolished or strengthened? Is a rational interpretation of constitutional law possible? The essays provide answers to these questions and describe how constitutional courts work if they properly fulfill their function of enforcing the constitution. A special emphasis is put on the importance of constitutional interpretation: something, the author argues, that most critics of constitutional adjudication neglect.

Produktdetails

• Verlag: Bloomsbury Academic
• Seitenzahl: 384
• Erscheinungstermin: 12. Dezember 2024
• Englisch
• Abmessung: 234mm x 156mm x 25mm
• Gewicht: 454g
• ISBN-13: 9781509976850
• ISBN-10: 150997685X
• Artikelnr.: 70273370

Autorenporträt

Dieter Grimm is an internationally renowned authority on constitutional law, constitutional theory, constitutional history and constitutional adjudication.

Inhaltsangabe

Part I: A Prelude 1. The Federal Constitutional Court of Germany - A Survey
Part II: Judicial Review and Democracy 2. Constitutional Adjudication in a
Democratic System 3. Neither Indispensable nor Contradictory.
Constitutional Adjudication and Democracy Part III: Constitutional
Adjudication: Law or Politics? 4. What Exactly is Political about
Constitutional Adjudication? 5. Law or Politics? The Kelsen-Schmitt
Controversy over Constitutional Adjudication and the Current Situation
Part IV: The Process: Constitutional Interpretation 6. Constitutions,
Constitutional Courts and Constitutional Interpretation at the Interface of
Law and Politics 7. On the Relationship between Interpretation Theory,
Constitutional Adjudication and the Democracy Principle in Kelsen 8.
Habermas on Constitutional Jurisprudence 9. Behind the Scenes: The Genesis
of the Elfes Judgment 10. Constitutional Jurisprudence and Constitutional
Scholarship Part V: Institutional Questions 11. Problems Relating to the
System of Specialised Constitutional Courts in Germany 12. On the
Relationship Between the Constitutional Court and Ordinary Courts Part VI:
Europe: Competing Courts 13. The Role of National Constitutional Courts in
European Democracy 14. A Long Time Coming Part VII: Opponents 15. New
Radical Criticism of Constitutional Adjudication