Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Procedural Politics]( "Procedural Politics")
Procedural Politics116,99 €![Reasoning for Intelligence Analysts]( "Reasoning for Intelligence Analysts")
Reasoning for Intelligence Analysts133,99 €![A New Model of Political Reasoning]( "A New Model of Political Reasoning")
A New Model of Political Reasoning44,99 €![Reasoning With Who We Are]( "Reasoning With Who We Are")
Reasoning With Who We Are155,99 €![The Psychology of Foreign Policy]( "The Psychology of Foreign Policy")
The Psychology of Foreign Policy95,99 €![The Power of Creative Reasoning]( "The Power of Creative Reasoning")
The Power of Creative Reasoning25,99 €![North Korea, Nuclear Risk-Taking, and the United States]( "North Korea, Nuclear Risk-Taking, and the United States")
North Korea, Nuclear Risk-Taking, and the United States107,99 €
The relationship between public opinion and the actions of institutions such as the Supreme Court has come under increased scrutiny in recent years. In this timely book, Eileen Braman explores how American citizens think about government across all three branches, applying a rigorous political scientific methodology to explore why citizens may support potentially risky changes to our governing system. As Braman highlights, Americans value institutions that they perceive as delivering personal and societal gains, and citizens who see these institutions as delivering potential losses are more supportive of fundamental constitutional change. In the face of growing resentment of government and recurring warnings of constitutional crisis, Braman offers a hopeful note: her findings suggest that politicians can channel discontent toward meaningful reform and the healthy evolution of our democratic system.