Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Close Support Artillery for the U.S. Light Infantry Division]( "Close Support Artillery for the U.S. Light Infantry Division")
Close Support Artillery for the U.S. Light Infantry Division64,99 €![Direct Support Field Artillery Battalion: Counterfire or Close Support?]( "Direct Support Field Artillery Battalion: Counterfire or Close Support?")
Direct Support Field Artillery Battalion: Counterfire or Close Support?63,99 €![Union Artillery at the Battle of Chickamauga]( "Union Artillery at the Battle of Chickamauga")
Union Artillery at the Battle of Chickamauga63,99 €![Artillery Employment at the Battle of Gettysburg]( "Artillery Employment at the Battle of Gettysburg")
Artillery Employment at the Battle of Gettysburg63,99 €![Airland Battle and the Division Artillery Counterfire Dilemma]( "Airland Battle and the Division Artillery Counterfire Dilemma")
Airland Battle and the Division Artillery Counterfire Dilemma64,99 €![Continuous Operations: The Time Dimension of Battle]( "Continuous Operations: The Time Dimension of Battle")
Continuous Operations: The Time Dimension of Battle64,99 €![Should the Current Direct Support Artillery Battalions of the Heavy Division be Organic to the Maneuver Brigade?]( "Should the Current Direct Support Artillery Battalions of the Heavy Division be Organic to the Maneuver Brigade?")
Should the Current Direct Support Artillery Battalions of the Heavy Division be Organic to the Maneuver Brigade?63,99 €
This study examines the U.S. Army Field Artillery's current capability to provide close support to maneuver units on the AirLand Battlefield. It first analyses the environment of the modern battlefield and finds that in spite of technological improvements in weapons and command and control capabilities a preponderance of artillery fires will be needed at the small unit level and very close to friendly troops. The whole notion of close support is therefore historically examined in some detail to determine what close support means today and what precise demands it places on the field artillery system. From there the study goes on to examine the field artillery structure in the heavy division to determine its capability to provide the necessary support. A major conclusion is that if the division battle is to be won, then the priority of fire support effort must be focused on actions that will take place within 300 meters of friendly positions. Close support fires must be immediately responsive to units in contact. They must be closely integrated with all other means of fire support and delivered with finesse and precision as part of the overall scheme of maneuver. The study also concludes that the current artillery structure is ill-prepared to provide such close support. Field artillery organization, equipment, doctrine, and conceptual thinking leans toward efficiency in target destruction, not toward wedding fire support to maneuver requirements. It appears that within the fire support community the balance between firepower and maneuver is precarious at best.
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.